HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
Then we'd write our done_by role above as:
role Num-1.3-JRANDOM does STD:Num does Complex;
method re (-- STD:Num) { self }
method im (-- STD:Num) { 0.0 }
The first issue I see with this approach is that we get one
more contender for the plain name Complex
Ovid wrote:
(reversed the message a bit)
is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
This looks like a Test bug; it's doing something like:
is 'b', 'a' # not ok
is 'b', 'b' # ok
is 'b', 'c' # not ok
...
If you write:
ok 'b' === any('a'..'h')
The result is one passing
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
: Ovid wrote:
: (reversed the message a bit)
:is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
:
: This looks like a Test bug; it's doing something like:
:
:is 'b', 'a' # not ok
:is 'b', 'b' # ok
:is 'b', 'c' #
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New Revision: 13495
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
+In addition to Cnext METHOD, the special functions Ccallsame,
+Ccallwith, Cnextsame, and Cnextwith dispatch to the next
+candidate, possibly with a new argument list, and if the next
+variant is used, without
Author: larry
Date: Wed Dec 20 18:42:50 2006
New Revision: 13497
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Made Range objects smarter about transforms.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
---
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:24:55PM +, Smylers wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: New Revision: 13495
: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
:
: +In addition to Cnext METHOD, the special functions Ccallsame,
: +Ccallwith, Cnextsame, and Cnextwith dispatch to the next
: +candidate,
