> But by using the term ‘variable’, which is ambiguous, you are not
> answering my question! :-)
Sorry. I tend to think of *every* variable name as merely being
an alias for some underlying storage mechanism. ;-)
> Does
>
> my $x;
> for 1..10 -> $x {}
>
> cause the existing name $x to ref
On 07/08/2012 09:57 PM, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> my $x;
> my sub f { say $x }
> for 1..10 -> $x { f(); }
It prints
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
Any()
(because Any is the default value in uninitialized variables).
As an aside, you can run short Per
On 07/08/2012 11:12 AM, Damian Conway wrote:
> Father Chrysostomos pointed out:
>
>> I said when, not whether. :-)
>
> Isn't that just typical of me: confusing ontology with chronology. ;-)
>
> I'm afraid don't know the implementation details for Rakudo. It may be
> bound as the surrounding block i
On 07/08/2012 11:12 AM, Damian Conway wrote:
> Father Chrysostomos pointed out:
>
>> I said when, not whether. :-)
>
> Isn't that just typical of me: confusing ontology with chronology. ;-)
>
> I'm afraid don't know the implementation details for Rakudo. It may be
> bound as the surrounding bloc
Father Chrysostomos pointed out:
> I said when, not whether. :-)
Isn't that just typical of me: confusing ontology with chronology. ;-)
I'm afraid don't know the implementation details for Rakudo. It may be
bound as the surrounding block is entered, or perhaps just-in-time when
the Code object i
