On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Garrett Goebel wrote:
The only acceptable code name other than "Perl6" is "YACN" ;)
What's that? You Actually Cannot Tell? Yes, All the Code is New? Yet
Another Crazy Notion?
--
Mike Pastore #!Perl Monk Web Co
a rev $MTC };
And they thought Perl was unreadable before... just wait 'til they get a
load of this!
--
Mike Pastore #!Perl Monk Web Coder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bilogic.org Sys Admin
the dust) and we would have a whole lot more detail regarding arrays
during array ops.
Any thoughts on this?
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and Perl becomes C.
int a;
struct b;
*cough* No, thank you.
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, David Corbin wrote:
Mike Pastore wrote:
$hashish{'dog'}# one whutzit
@hashish{'dog', 'cat'} # more than one whutzits
each %hashish # one whutzit, indexed
%hashish # all whutzits, indexed
keys %hashish
to the next
line, not pausing to read all the way through to see that Cthings is
obviously plural. Again, I refer you to Dan Sugalski's message about this.
You are asking wrong/unnecessary questions, and getting wrong answers.
That was disturbingly Zen. ;-)
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
excuse the silly example.
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS -
my @foo = ('apples', 'oranges');
my %bar = ('apples' = 'crunchy', 'oranges' = 'juicy');
my $zot = 'bananas';
my $ret = junkem(\@foo, \%bar, $zot);
sub junkem {
my($a, $b, $c) = $_;
my @d;
unshift(@$a, $c);
foreach
! $det'yiu!
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
';# mnemonic, NOT as in NOT change
$'bar = 'unchanging'; # klingon?
$.zot = 'static';
Foo for thought.
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s starting to become much more math oriented! Maybe they'll start
teaching Perl 6 instead of Fortran for CS300, hmm?
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Ted Ashton wrote:
Quite true. The two-argument one is new to me and I hadn't thought much
about it. Do you have a suggestion?
Hmm,
chomp { /\r\n/ } @chomp_me;
ala p5 map, grep, and sort?
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p
$fh-chomp('\r\n'); # on, use alternative
Hmm.. methinks this is starting to look unperlish.
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl++
:)
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000, Bennett Todd wrote:
If perl6 substantially fails to fill the important roles that perl5
fills, we should stop screwing everybody up by calling it "perl",
and call it something else.
Hmmm. I vote for
of Perl6. :)
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Ken Fox wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
The number of different vtables needed to deal with this (along with
the functions in those tables) is rather formidable, and it will tend
to impact performance.
Hey! That sounds like an implementation topic... ;) (The internals
is the placeholder 'foo'
- $_ is the default variable
- ^_ is the default placeholder
Or any variation, given Nathan Wiger's original list (! ^ ) and others.
Although, I suppose '' would not work.
I too am having trouble following the current placeholder syntax. :)
Regards,
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL
Ken Fox wrote:
- ^foo is the placeholder 'foo'
That already has perfectly good meaning: XOR with the function foo().
Good point. Back to the drawing board?
Although, I suppose '' would not work.
Why not? I think it would work great.
Well, what's the different between the
und that's been trod
before. In any case, I'd like to hear what you guys think about this.
Especially Damian, because he's the poor sap writing the RFC. :-P
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
comments in Perl, how about something like #$ .. $# or #* ..
*#? There is something to be said for the cliche ## comment blocks
at the top of Perl programs, but maybe a neater alternative should be
considered...
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bers, the set of all natural numbers, the set of integers, etc.? No
sense in mangling the .. operator (not to mention the anonymous array
reference) to suit a specific purpose like that.
--
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
