On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:46:14 +0300, Yuval Kogman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I like your Pack object - that is the parsed template, but I'd also
like to be able to generate these templates with a programmatic
interface that isn't string concatenation...
Is it just a simple data
I have a fundamental disagreement with what pack used to be - it's
too stringish... =)
the printf and unpack syntaxes always bothered me because they are
akin to 'eval'ing, more than they are to quasi quoting.
I like your Pack object - that is the parsed template, but I'd also
like to be able to
Last night I had an idea about a possable pack API. Most likely when
Pugs gets signifigently powerfull I will attempt to implement it.
However I would like everyones input, below is a draft of its POD.
=head1 NAME
Pack - (un)pack structures as defined by a Template
=head1 SYNOPSIS
my Pack
