RE: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-30 Thread Fisher Mark
Al Lipscomb writes: I was wondering about maybe being able to store these attributes as optional parts of the scalar. Something like this (please don't get hung up on the details, I am not much of a designer): my($amt,$hours,$total); $amt-{TYPE} = "DOLLARS"; $total-{TYPE} =

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-30 Thread David L. Nicol
Fisher Mark wrote: * Units of measure are optional; * Units of measure are fast; and * Implementing units of measure don't appreciably slow down computations that don't use units of measure. enforced types without automatic conversions does all this, the matches are made once at

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-29 Thread Peter Scott
At 12:57 PM 8/29/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote: I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. It's a holdover from when I was heavily into chemistry. Some of the other RFCs on the list also appear to have been triggered the same way. Oh, wait... :-) -- Peter Scott

RE: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-29 Thread Lipscomb, Al
I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. That's not what I call a high-level language feature. People don't want to think about that, nor about machine-level precision issues. See REXX. In fact, I'd rather to see a painless and transparent int-float-bignum

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-29 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote: I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. While that might be useful for simple calculations, I expect it would simply get in the way and slow things down for larger, more complex calculations. Alas I don't think there's any

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-29 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 02:49 PM 8/29/00 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote: I'd like to see every number bundled with a "precision" attribute. While that might be useful for simple calculations, I expect it would simply get in the way and slow things down for larger, more

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-28 Thread Steve Simmons
I'd like to see eq and it's brethen retained, as dammit there are times I want to know (-w) if numbers are turning up when there should be words and vice-versa. However, spinning off of something Randal wrote: Yes, but what about: $a = '3.14'; # from reading a file $b =

Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Ed Mills
Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? $a == 'cat' is readily distinguishable from $a == 2; so the compiler should be able to determine context. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Spider Boardman
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:50:20 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote (in part): Nat Ed Mills writes: Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? $a == 'cat' is readily distinguishable from $a == 2; so the compiler should be able to determine context. Nat if ($a == $b) Nat Is that