On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
I'm kinda surfing the edge here. -T is definately an internals issue,
but $TAINT? taint()? is_tainted()?
I'm not sure if they should be exposed into the language from the
internals, or if a superstudly taint.xs in stdlib is
At 03:43 PM 9/15/00 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
I'm kinda surfing the edge here. -T is definately an internals issue,
but $TAINT? taint()? is_tainted()?
I'm not sure if they should be exposed into the language from the
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:01:11PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Anyhow, however these extra tainting functions are implemented is fine
(as long as they work). The simplest thing would be to just merge and
patch up Taint.pm and distribute it with perl6.
Yup. I know Tom wanted an all-perl
Michael G Schwern wrote:
perl6-internals is probably the wrong forum for this, it was just
convenient. I think Dan's got the right idea, distribute a Taint
module with Perl.
I'm not sure what's happened on -internals, but early on in
perl6-language I suggested something similar, and Larry
