Over the past week, I've been using my scant bits of nighttime coding to
cobble together a pseudocode version of what I think the URI module should
look like. There's already one available as example code, but it doesn't
actually implement either the URI or IRI spec correctly. Instead, this
Hi,
Aaron Sherman wrote:
Over the past week, I've been using my scant bits of nighttime coding to
cobble together a pseudocode version of what I think the URI module should
look like. There's already one available as example code, but it doesn't
actually implement either the URI or IRI spec
Aaron Sherman wrote:
Ooops, took this off-list by accident.
-- Forwarded message --
From: ajs a...@ajs.com
Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: URI replacement pseudocode
To: Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org
Thank you for your responses!
On Mon, May 17
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Aaron Sherman wrote:
I had a hard time even getting basic code working like:
token foo { blah }
if blah ~~ m/foo/ { say blah! }
(See my question to the list, last week)
Right. What works today is
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Aaron Sherman wrote:
I had a hard time even getting basic code working like:
token foo { blah }
if blah ~~ m/foo/ { say blah! }
(See my question to the list, last week)
Right. What works today is