Re: summarizing the obvious (was: arrays, hashes unified ...)

2003-02-02 Thread Sam Vilain
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 06:40, Garrett Goebel wrote: Or for the extremely thick: GOOD: Separate syntax for indexed vs. named lookups BAD: Same syntax with = 2 contextual meanings Or, another way to look at it; GOOD: flexible, re-usable code that doesn't care if you change the key type

summarizing the obvious (was: arrays, hashes unified ...)

2003-01-31 Thread Garrett Goebel
From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: $idx_of_foo = $queue['foo']; # named lookup $nth_foo= $queue[600]; # ordered lookup One is SvPOK the other SvIOK... Can't we handle both and still have the ordered lookup be fast? [...] YOU

Re: summarizing the obvious

2003-01-31 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 09:40 AM, Garrett Goebel wrote: Or for the extremely thick: GOOD: Separate syntax for indexed vs. named lookups BAD: Same syntax with = 2 contextual meanings Seriously, everyone read Damian's Seven Deadly Sins thing, if ya haven't read/heard it already.

out-of-place-rant (was: summarizing the obvious)

2003-01-31 Thread Garrett Goebel
Michael Lazzaro wrote: On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 09:40 AM, Garrett Goebel wrote: out-of-place-rant I'm disappointed that The Perl Foundation (TPF) has been so quiet and unresponsive on support for our core language designers and architects. I dropped a note to all the TPF