Piers Cawley wrote:
> > In my opinion the contents of $ME should allow to determine wether it was
> > called as a procedure or as a method, the easiest way to do that is undef
> > for procedure, object for method and classname for class methods.
>
> Procedure reference for a procedure call pleas
Markus Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On 22.08.2000 18:24 Uhr + David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> >
> > Regardless of what its called, in a method called as a subroutine,
> > the variable could refer to the last instance of this kind of object
> > used by this thread.
>
> Hmm Does that m
Markus Peter wrote:
>
> ... then I run into trouble
> if the method author does not even know wether its procedural or OO.
What I wrote is dependent on an environmnet where the C keyword
is used to write methods that are distinct from subroutines, and
also, a C with the same name could be writt
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Yes, that's pretty much it. More opportunity to be lazy, but only
> if you know how. This way the authors of methods never have to fiddle
> with checking ever again. And users who call methods like subroutines
> had better know what they are doing
Markus Peter wrote:
>
> --On 22.08.2000 18:24 Uhr + David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> >
> > Regardless of what its called, in a method called as a subroutine,
> > the variable could refer to the last instance of this kind of object
> > used by this thread.
>
> Hmm Does that mean if I once all $
--On 22.08.2000 18:24 Uhr + David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> Regardless of what its called, in a method called as a subroutine,
> the variable could refer to the last instance of this kind of object
> used by this thread.
Hmm Does that mean if I once all $obj->method() and then afterwards
somew
