RE: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash

2000-08-18 Thread Brust, Corwin
-Original Message- From: David L. Nicol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How about %students : ( sort = $$students{^1}{GPA} <=> $$students{^0}{GPA} }); O, this is cool. -Original Message- my %students : sorted( $ME{^1}{GPA} <=> $ME{^0}{GPA} ); And th

RE: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash)

2000-08-21 Thread Brust, Corwin
-Original Message- From: Damian Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] And don't forget to include my idea that $ME be scoped locally like $AUTOLOAD, so that the "self" and "this" and "I" and "myself" camps can have their respective cakes but the rest of us don't have to eat them: [...]

RE: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like"with" or "express"

2000-08-23 Thread Brust, Corwin
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think what David wanted was an easy way to reference other keys of an hash while creating one, ie: How to do this, in a line: %h = ( first => 10 ); $h{second} = $h{first} * 2; Because, as I'm sure you know, this code (when run w/out strict):

RE: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH is still Re: implied pascal-like"with" or "express"

2000-08-23 Thread Brust, Corwin
-Original Message- From: Jonathan Scott Duff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 1:06 PM To: David L. Nicol Cc: Nathan Torkington; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH is still Re: implied pascal-like"with" or "express" [...] How special p

RE: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "express"

2000-08-24 Thread Brust, Corwin
-Original Message- From: Bart Lateur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "express" On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote: