Re: RFC 170 (v2) Generalize =~ to a special apply-to assignment operator

2000-09-26 Thread Simon Cozens
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 05:41:57AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: . Some criticized it as being too sugary, since this: $string =~ quotemeta;# $string = quotemeta $string; Is not as clear as the original. However, there is fairly similar precedent in: $x += 5;

Re: RFC 308 (v1) Ban Perl hooks into regexes

2000-09-25 Thread Simon Cozens
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:31:08PM +0100, Hugo wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Perl6 RFC Librarian writes: :=head1 ABSTRACT : :Remove C?{ code }, C??{ code } and friends. Whoops, I missed this bit - what 'friends' do you mean? Whatever even more bizarre extensions people will have suggested

Re: RFC 308 (v1) Ban Perl hooks into regexes

2000-09-25 Thread Simon Cozens
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 08:56:47PM +, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: I think the proposal that Joe McMahon and I are finishing up now will make these obsolete anyway. Good! The less I have to maintain the better... -- Keep the number of passes in a compiler to a minimum. -- D.

Re: RFC 308 (v1) Ban Perl hooks into regexes

2000-09-25 Thread Simon Cozens
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:55:18PM -0400, Michael Maraist wrote: A lot of what is trying to happen in (?{..}) and friends is parsing. That's not the problem that I'm trying to solve. The problem I'm trying to solve is interdependence. Parsing is neither here nor there. -- Intel engineering