On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Darren Duncan wrote:
conceptual and a usability and a math point of view. If users only want the
integer value, then they can just store the second as an integer in the first
place. As for the name, well whole_second can be made shorter, or its
Users will not always
Darren Duncan wrote:
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On a smaller point, I think second vs whole_second is the wrong
Huffman coding. I'd think most people want the integer value.
Well, whatever you call things, the most important thing is to keep
the seconds count as a single number which can do
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Darren Duncan wrote:
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On a smaller point, I think second vs whole_second is the wrong
Huffman coding. I'd think most people want the integer value.
Well, whatever you call things, the most important thing is to keep
the seconds count as a single
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Worthington jonat...@jnthn.netwrote:
Though even clearer and same number of characters as whole_seconds is:
$dt.seconds.round
This makes more sense to me than the first example you listed because when
dealing with time measurement, I rarely think of
