Re: S29 update ready

2006-07-09 Thread Aaron Sherman
Darren Duncan wrote: At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty string, which is a

S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Aaron Sherman
I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so far, and I think I'm ready to officially update S29. For that I need two things: 1) I'd really like Larry to glance over the changes and $s29.bless but all comments are welcome 2) I'll need commit rights to whatever

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Joe Gottman
-Original Message- From: Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 6:05 PM To: Perl6 Language List Subject: S29 update ready I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so far, and I think I'm ready to officially update S29

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Duncan
At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty string, which is a reasonable degenerate case

RE: S29 update ready

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Duncan
At 6:25 PM -0700 7/8/06, Darren Duncan wrote: At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote: I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string? I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty