with schedules very well.
I think you did quite a good job; I expect the issue to come back up again
when Larry's had a chance to look over the proposals and we'll have a few
more chances to clarify and talk it through.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
ly don't want to get into.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
why Larry never
bothered before with making the AL more lawyer-proof; since he intended it
to be used in conjuction with the GPL, it didn't need to be, since the GPL
was always there as a well-understood legal license if someone needed one
for some reason.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED
o internal structural changes, is even more
complicated than that.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
erlLicense
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
with implicit agreements are
frightening.
If you're arguing an implicit agreement, that means you have to convince a
court that you can read minds and know what the contributor was thinking
when they submitted their modifications. Not the position you want to be
in.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL
no sense to me. Would you say this about the deed to your
house?
One of the primary jobs of a lawyer is, given a specification from a
client on what they want to say, drafting the legal language that
accurately says that.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org
