At 10:42 AM 11/3/00 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval,
generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p is
rather less polite about things.
I
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] whispere
d:
| On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
| Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval,
| generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p
Comparing the perl6-language and the perl5-porters simply doesn't fly.
It's not even comparing apples and oranges, it's like comparing
a busy market place and a faculty lunch.
In the first case we are talking about a crowd of people most of which
do not know each other, do not know what the
Ok,
Iv'e seen this debate - I will try to put something constructive:-
Richard
=Head1 My opinions of the Perl6 RFC process
=head2 Where do I come from this?
I am an amauteur perl user who uses it on web sites and for other admin
tasks. Have I looked at the code? - Yes. Do I know the
Anyone think others are needed?
"Myopia neither equates the absence of existence of a distant object, nor
demonstrates the insanity of the non-myopic."
or, roughly translated, "Issues should be faced rather than avoided by
attacking the person who points them out."
