On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:02:28PM -0400, Christopher Masto wrote:
> Having gone through much the same pain a couple of weeks ago (although
> I just broke down and installed the linux-jdk-1.3.1 port after Sun's
> web site told me to come back later), I eagerly await a pure-Perl
> replacement for F
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:18:07PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Adam Turoff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
> *>
> *>Nevertheless, a degenerate case for installing Perl never requires
> *>transfers or temporary disk space measured in quarter gigabytes.
>
> Sure it can.
Allow me to clarify: a
Having gone through much the same pain a couple of weeks ago (although
I just broke down and installed the linux-jdk-1.3.1 port after Sun's
web site told me to come back later), I eagerly await a pure-Perl
replacement for FOP (http://xml.apache.org/fop/index.html)).
--
Christopher Masto S
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:51:33PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> *>That's their fault. Find a better distribution.
>
> There are a lot of Solaris 8 users out there and to have a broken OEM Perl
> is not optimal. That response would not be well received.
If distributes a broken Perl with
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Not all OS, though most, have Perl in the base install and those that do
> even have problems. Config.pm has issues on HP and Sun, RedHat has spotty
> RPMs that occsaionally go awry.
That's their fault. Find a better distrib
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> > Not all OS, though most, have Perl in the base install and those that do
> > even have problems. Config.pm has issues on HP and Sun, RedHat has spotty
> > RPMs that occsaionall
