Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation

2000-11-17 Thread John van V
"David Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > But.. but... but... we don't even have a design spec. I mean, we don't > even know for sure what Perl 6 is going to look like for certain, inside > or outside. This is precisely why I proposed the BS level just below Development. In fact I'm going

Re: Guidelines for internals proposals and documentation

2000-11-15 Thread John van V
Using the IBM article that Jarkko found as an example, core implementations of different languages may have more in common with each other than implemetations of the same language, I think PPC is actually significant enough so that it should not be painted into a perl-only corner. Seeing tha

Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org.... Actaually have a good name sugest

2001-02-22 Thread John van V
I actually have a good name... shakedown (as in cruise, matches CPANTS) The puny.vm.com server is available as always** VMWare promised licenses so we can run NT, other win32 crap, Solaris x86. Performance should not be an issue since it is overnight batching. Personally I would want to