Thanks for your feedback, all.
Elizabeth, I've posted this on problem-solving, as suggested, as
https://github.com/Raku/problem-solving/issues/308 . Thanks!
yary, definitely good feedback, and I agree that I've probably attached
these things to the wrong object(s); that part of the proposal neve
Tim,
Love the suggestions, but some of the syntax is a little confusing. Let me
see if I can reword these a bit:
First off, the good:
BEGIN {} COMPILE ENTER {}
CHECK {} COMPILE LEAVE {}
INIT {} RUNTIME ENTER {}
END {} RUNTIME LEAVE {}
DOC * DOC * (No change)
ENTER {} ENTER {} (No change)
L
I suggest making this a problem-solving issue:
https://github.com/raku/problem-solving
> On 11 Dec 2021, at 05:48, Timothy Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've been lurking on this list for years (and once won an "oldest resurrected
> conversation" award). I've loved Raku conceptually since
Hi all.
I've been lurking on this list for years (and once won an "oldest
resurrected conversation" award). I've loved Raku conceptually since the
start, but have only recently been putting it to much use. Mostly, the
reality is as good as the promises, but there are two areas I have been
liking