Hello,
I have a function like this:
sub test(Str :$format, :@filter)
{
say $format;
say @filter;
}
and I wish to have a stricter type control over the second parameter.
The natural way to do it seemed this:
sub test(Str :$format, Array[Str] :$filter)
{
say $format;
say $filter;
}
but
Hi,
On 07.01.2017 12:45, Fernando Santagata wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a function like this:
>
> sub test(Str :$format, :@filter)
> {
> say $format;
> say @filter;
> }
>
> and I wish to have a stricter type control over the second parameter.
>
> The natural way to do it seemed this:
>
> s
Being able to type the elements in containers was considered a major
problem in Java for years before they added generics. And the whole point
of having a computer is to have it do repetitive things, e.g. loop over a
bunch of stuff and do the same thing to all of it. How is this an
"exaggerated" us
Hi,
On 07.01.2017 15:52, Joseph Garvin wrote:
> Being able to type the elements in containers was considered a major
> problem in Java for years before they added generics.
Please note that Java and Perl 6 are coming from very different
directions. Java 1 a statically typed language, where every
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> > How is this an
> > "exaggerated" use of containers? Why have the language feature at all if
> > it's too clunky for people to use it?
>
> I'm not saying it's always too clunky to use. I'm saying there's a cost
> attached, and you should consi
Hi,
If you really want to avoid `Array[Str].new`, you can do something like
this:
sub foo (@a where .all ~~ Str) {...}
On 2017-01-07 11:45:55 GMT, Fernando Santagata wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a function like this:
>
> sub test(Str :$format, :@filter)
> {
> say $format;
> say @filter;
> }
>
On 1/7/17, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> I observe some weird behavior in Perl 6 newbies (and I've observed it in
> myself too): they're so enamored by type constraints that they use them
> everywhere, and run into all sorts of type errors they didn't expect.
>
There seems to be no feature in software (e
Hello, I'm new here.
Firstly, I like Perl 6. It has some nice attractive features that makes
me want to finally settle down to learn the language, the beauty and the
ugly, and become a part of this growing community.
Despite of what people say about Perl and Perl 6 users community, I
found the co
Welcome. What are your principal applications for P6 likely to be?
On 1/7/17, faraco wrote:
> Hello, I'm new here.
>
> Firstly, I like Perl 6. It has some nice attractive features that makes
> me want to finally settle down to learn the language, the beauty and the
> ugly, and become a part of th