On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35:27AM -0400, yary wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> >complete different usage but it would be nice to have a flag for "use
> >strict" both in perl5 and 6
>
> /me nominates -W as "a bigger -w" .. oh wait, -W already exists as a
> depreci
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
>complete different usage but it would be nice to have a flag for "use
>strict" both in perl5 and 6
/me nominates -W as "a bigger -w" .. oh wait, -W already exists as a
depreciated-in-my-view perl5 flag.
In that case, I also like "-E" as "ru
Single-purpose tools that can be used in a pipeline; what a concept! :-)*
On 8/27/15, Tadeusz Sośnierz wrote:
> This will probably impact quite a few people, so I thought I'll explain
> myself here :)
>
> As of now, panda will not precompile Perl 6 code anymore. This will
> introduce unexpected s
This will probably impact quite a few people, so I thought I'll explain
myself here :)
As of now, panda will not precompile Perl 6 code anymore. This will
introduce unexpected slowness, for instance HTTP::UserAgent now takes
5.4 seconds to load instead of 0.8 on my machine.
It may now sound
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:00:09PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > It used to be, but that was not according to spec. FROGGS++ implemented
> > the lax mode, which is enabled by default in one-liners. Perhaps TimToady
> > wants to invoke rule #2 on this.
> > Personally, I use an alias that has ‘