Re: HTTP::Request/Response (was Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6)

2006-09-15 Thread Michael Snoyman
On 9/14/06, Darren Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having had some prior experience in tackling this problem (eg, CGI::Portable), I will endeavour to work on / help with the Perl 6 analogy to HTTP::Request/Response, so to replace the use of corresponding aspects of CGI.pm. I really like this

CGI Session management (was Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6)

2006-09-11 Thread Michael Snoyman
If Perl6 CGI.pm is intended to be the successor of the P5 CGI.pm (the quasi-standard for Perl web programming) is should really get a modern design. I agree completely. In that vein, I think that one thing a lot of web developers would like to have available more easily would be session

Re: IO::Socket, or any IO

2006-09-08 Thread Michael Snoyman
effect, but it seems that fork also isn't available. Was I missing something, or are these just features that I need to wait for? Thanks, Michael On 9/8/06, Audrey Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 在 Aug 25, 2006 12:54 AM 時,Michael Snoyman 寫到: I was thinking of rewriting a little webserver

IO::Socket, or any IO

2006-08-24 Thread Michael Snoyman
I was thinking of rewriting a little webserver program I wrote in Perl 5 using Pugs. I was wondering what the equivilent (if any) of IO::Socket is. I suppose I could use an external webserver and use CGI to get this working with IO, but my preference would be a pure Perl 6 approach. If you're

Same-named arguments

2006-08-23 Thread Michael Snoyman
Hi, I'm just starting with Perl 6. I was reading through Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials (finally arrived yesterday from Amazon; very happy) and I was wondering what would happen if you had a parameter list that included variables of a different type but the same name (ie, $foo, @foo). I wrote a