Matt Todd wrote:
[Lots of stuff]
General comment: It's much easier to comprehend posts in mail lists or
reading through the archives if you quote something of what you're
responding to.
Now, to the requirements talk: how important is the availability of
revision history in this
On 11/06/06, Matt Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) I agree that it is both important and pertinent to get the general
requirements down for the project, but I do see a need and a benefit
to having the architecture forming in the meanwhile. I see how these
things can be connected, obviously, but
From: Michael Mathews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having just been away on yet /another/ training course in Agile
methodology, I'd say this is a classic disconnect of concerns.
Sounds
like Conrad just want something that works, and can be available
quickly -- a rather traditional customer
