Using a set would be good but it doesn't give you the matching string from
the original (which is what I thought was required) otherwise Sets would be
my first thought.
On Sun, 1 Sep 2019, 17:57 William Michels, wrote:
> Hi Yary and Paul and Simon,
>
> I ran into the same difficulties as Yary
Hi Yary and Paul and Simon,
I ran into the same difficulties as Yary with repeated characters, so
I tried the .unique method. Then after a while, I realized that
problems like this might best be treated as "Set" problems in Perl6.
Note the Set Intersection operator "(&)" below:
sub
sub contains ( Str $chars, Str $_ ) {
m:g/<{$chars.comb}>+/
};
This will return all the sets of matching strings but it is doing runtime
evaluation of your character string so it's a bit slow.
On Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 04:59, Paul Procacci wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure if this is the correct
Thanks for the ideas. The core issue I'm probing is runtime construction of
character classes, with an eye towards opening a documentation issue, or
maybe even an issue against the character class implementation.
Simon's workaround m:g/<{$chars.comb}>+/ is interesting, interpolating a
list which
Hi,
[resending]
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:47:10 +0800
Cloud Cache wrote:
> Hi Elizabeth,
>
> Thanks for the encouragement.
> I am not good at low level system development, just using the high-level
> API from tensorflow/keras etc.
> So I hope there should have perl's framework appearing.
>
I was just trying to run Simon Proctor's solution, and I see it
working for Yary's first case, but not his more complex one with
problem characters like brackets included in the list of characters.
I don't really see how to fix it, in part because I'm not that
clear on what it's actually doing...
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:12 AM Joseph Brenner wrote:
> I was just trying to run Simon Proctor's solution, and I see it
> working for Yary's first case, but not his more complex one with
> problem characters like brackets included in the list of characters.
>
> I don't really see how to fix it,
Hi Paul,
Neither of those match for me- adapted below
#!/usr/bin/env perl6
use v6;
sub matching_chars(Str $match, Str $y) {
say 'eval = ', $y.match: /<{ "<[$match]>" }>/;
say 'direct= ', $y.match: /<[$match]>/;
my $rematch := $match;
say 'bound = ', $y.match: /<[$rematch]>/;
Thanks Simon, good point. I ran into the same trouble as others trying
to get the answer via regex, and switched over to sets as an
alternative. I'll confess I completely missed that Yary's Perl5 code
returned the substring "8420" present in his test "19584203" string,
and that was the answer he
I've actually found some weird inconsistancy while playing with this.
sub matching_chars(Str $x, Str $y) {
my $a := $x;
my $b := $y;
say $y.match: /<[$a]>/;
}
That results in a match of one character, yet:
sub matching_chars(Str $x, Str $y) {
my $a := $x;
my $b := $y;
10 matches
Mail list logo
