Re: [perpass] privacy implications of UUIDs for IoT devices

The Eddystone ephemeral identifier for BLE work from Google may be of interest to some here (doesn't solve cases of unknown neighbors): https://developers.google.com/beacons/eddystone-eid On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Christian Huitema wrote: > > On Thursday, October 6,

Re: [perpass] privacy implications of UUIDs for IoT devices

Christian Huitema wrote: >> I'd love to find a way to send the identifier only to an authorized >> operator, >> which is resistant to an active MITM, given that the new device (the >> pledge) >> doesn't know who the authorized operator is yet. > We

Re: [perpass] privacy implications of UUIDs for IoT devices

Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: > The Eddystone ephemeral identifier for BLE work from Google may be of > interest to some here (doesn't solve cases of unknown neighbors): > https://developers.google.com/beacons/eddystone-eid It's a good solution for an ID once the system