Fine with me. Everything seems to be going for me.
Matt
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
OK, fine with me...
BTW, Had you any chance to look and try examples at tutorials/python ?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at
I need to understand what you use this variable for. If you are just
linking, then you
do not need it. If you want configure information, then you need it in order
to get
anything, so specifying in a file will not help.
Matt
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Jose E. Roman jroman at dsic.upv.es
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
I would like to add that, despite the new buildsystem if by far better
than the old one, PETSc has lost a nice feature of being able of being
installed in a central location for multiple $PETSC_ARCH's . This
feature
If PETSC_ARCH is not set, I would just use the default arch generated by
configure, like
we do in the PETSc configure.
Matt
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Jose E. Roman jroman at dsic.upv.es wrote:
On 12/12/2008, Jose E. Roman wrote:
SLEPc's configure.py uses the value of $PETSC_ARCH
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Ahmed El Zein ahmed at azein.com wrote:
I am working on a project where I would like to copy a sparse matrix in
CSR format.
I have tried MatGetRow() which works OK but I would really like to get
pointers to the 3 arrays directly.
I also tried MatGetRowIJ()
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Ahmed El Zein ahmed at azein.com wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 04:17 -0500, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Ahmed El Zein ahmed at azein.com wrote:
I am working on a project where I would like to copy a sparse matrix in
CSR format.
I
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Shi Jin jinzishuai at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi there,
I was trying to build petsc-dev on a IBM AIX but failed at c2html. I tried
not to use it with --with-c2html=0 but it seemed still be needed. Why do we
need it? I don't need to generate documentations for this
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Techas techas at gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I'm Sergio (X-FEM), we meet some weeks ago in Davis.
I'm playing a little bit with petsc to evaluate how much work will
take me mount my x-fem code on petsc.
Sorry I am just replying now. I returned from Norway
PETSc knows nothing about your domain, so it can't know what you might want
ghosted. I think the thing to do is use a VecScatter to map the input Vec to a
ghosted Vec (called a local vector in DA language).
Matt
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Eric Chamberland
Eric.Chamberland at
I would still maintain that PETSC_COMM_WORLD is the correct default. There
are better paradigms for embarassingly parallel operation, like Condor. PETSc
is intended for parallel, domain decomposition runs.
Matt
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I would still maintain that PETSC_COMM_WORLD is the correct default. There
are better paradigms for embarassingly parallel operation, like
Dalcin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
wrote:
I agree that people will do this, I just don't agree that it should be
the default.
Would you agree with the following:
At petsc4py initialization (and after calling PetscInitialize()), I
define
Barry
On Aug 25, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
wrote:
I agree that people will do this, I just don't agree that it should be
the default.
Would you agree with the following:
At petsc4py initialization
There is no concept of global for IS. They are purely serial. AO is the only
global construct with indices.
Matt
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
I believe we have to review the interface of ISBlock. Currently,
ISBlockGetSize() return the number
the ISBlock version as well.
Matt
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
There is no concept of global for IS. They are purely serial. AO is the
only
global construct with indices.
This is kind
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Aug 27, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com
wrote:
So, Do all us agree my proposed fix should be pushed? I'll wait for
Matt comments
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Even if an object (class) has NO collective operations, if, when you use
that object, you must have partners are all
other processes in a MPI_Comm then I think it is a good approach to have
that be a parallel
object
Just so I can remove this from my todo mail pile, it appears Barry is
doing this.
The actually Schur stuff is a new KSP thing so we do not link Mat to KSP, but
it should work as you want.
Matt
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote:
For context, I'm thinking of LNKS
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thomas DE-SOZA thomas.de-soza at edf.fr wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if in $PETSC_DIR/include/finclude/petscdef.h :
50#if defined(PETSC_HAVE_MPIUNI)
51#define MPI_Comm PetscFortranInt
52#define PetscMPIInt PetscFortranInt
1) I believe the Wathen-Elman-Silvester stuff is the best out there of the
shelf. I love the review
A.C. de Niet and F.W. Wubs Two preconditioners for saddle point
problems in fluid flows
Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 2007: 54: 355-377
2) Note in there that Augmented Lagrangian
using
/ \hat AB \
\ B^T 0 /
as a preconditioner is great since all the eigenvalues for the
constraint are preserved.
Matt
Thanks,
-- Boyce
Matthew Knepley wrote:
1) I believe the Wathen-Elman-Silvester stuff is the best out there of the
shelf. I love the review
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Boyce Griffith griffith at cims.nyu.edu
wrote:
Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Boyce Griffith griffith at cims.nyu.edu
wrote:
Hi, Matt et al. --
Do people ever use standard projection methods as preconditioners
Actually, making the regularization parameter independent for each
process is much more efficient. Gene Golub had a poster on this at
the last SIAM CSE meeting.
Matt
On Nov 1, 2007 9:24 AM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On 10/31/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 10:25 AM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
I would to propose some changes to error checking macros for optimized builds.
1.- SETERRQXXX: define them as
#define SETERRQ[1|2|..](ierr,...) return ierr
I think this is fine. However for it to matter, you need 2.
Are they all executables?
Matt
On 11/23/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Can we move maint to bin/maint?
Barry
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments
I thought he meant LFS.
Matt
On Nov 24, 2007 3:52 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Seems unlike that it would have the rule no subdirectory for bin.
Especially since
the H stands for hierarchical.
Barry
On Nov 24, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
From what I
On Nov 26, 2007 4:19 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On 11/26/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
I've looked long and hard for a PETSc bug that would cause this
problem.
No luck. It seems to happen mostly (only?) on certain machines.
Ups! I've found a possilbe
That seems fine.
Matt
On Nov 26, 2007 4:56 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On 11/26/07, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 4:19 PM, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com After
surfing the code and hacked PetscLogPrintSummary(), I added
Nothing is wrong with the PETSc build or libraries. However, your make
(probably not gmake) has a problem with the make rule that cleans up files
in bmake/common/rules:359. You can just ignore it (or tell us what is wrong).
Thanks,
Matt
On 5/10/07, Yi-Feng Adam Zhang Adam.Zhang at
On 5/10/07, Adam Zhang Adam.Zhang at sun.com wrote:
Thank you for input. I will try to use gmake later.
If this compilation is ok. can I release this as a Solaris package on
the internet?
I guess. What is it for?
Thanks,
Matt
Regards,
Adam
Matthew Knepley wrote:
Nothing
I would look at some PETSc examples, for instance
http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-as/snapshots/petsc-current/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex32.c.html
Matt
On 3/31/07, Waad Subber wsubber at connect.carleton.ca wrote:
Hello everyone:
I am new to PETSC. Reading the tutorials,
This is very vague concerning the structure of exernalpackages. I cannot tell
where libraries are supposed to end up, and how/when/why they might be moved.
It seems that the directory information coming from PETSc/package.py
has also changed.
Matt
On 6/8/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
(630) 252-5986 fax
9700 S. Cass Ave.tmunson at mcs.anl.gov
Argonne, IL 60439http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~tmunson
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Barry Smith wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Matthew Knepley wrote:
This is very vague concerning the structure
Also, I have talked to Wolfgang many times about this. I am a firm
believer in eliminating the boundary values during assembly at the
element level. PETSc provides an easy mechanism for this. By default,
all negative indices in calls to VecSetValues and MatSetValues are
ignored.
Matt
On
I am not going to ICIAM anymore (since international travel has become
impossible), so I am available I guess.
Matt
On 6/20/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Amit,
Thank you for the invitation to speak. Unfortunately I am not available
at that time, and I think a couple of
Pushed a fix.
Matt
On 7/6/07, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
Can someone look at this?
testexamples_C in: /u/dalcinl/Devel/PETSc/petsc-dev/src/dm/adda
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `testexamples_C', needed by `tree'. Stop.
--
Lisandro Dalc?n
---
Centro
We do generate makefiles, just not all of them. Automake is an unreadable,
inpenetrable mess that should never be used by anyone. Thus, we don't use it.
Thanks,
Matt
On 7/17/07, Sumit Vaidya sumit_vaidya at persistent.co.in wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded the version 2.3.3-p3.
Done.
Matt
On 7/17/07, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Will whoever wrote the manual pages for all the
AOApplicationToPetscPermute*() routines please add more
documentation explaining what they do? Maybe some algebraic
formula or something: Permutes an array of blocks of reals
I'm for it. Barry, do you want to mail scan-admin at coverity.com?
Matt
On 7/19/07, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
Have any of you ever consider asking PETSc being included here, as
it is an open source project?
http://scan.coverity.com/index.html
From many sources (mainly
On 8/23/07, Adrian Tate adrian at cray.com wrote:
Hi Barry
Thanks for your reply.
We will expect to provide the new full releases of PETSc as soon as we
possibly can. Obviously there is something of a lag because Cray need to
test, package and release the library, but we'll try to do so
*petscPerm;
} AO_Mapping;
typedef struct {
PetscInt N;
PetscInt *app,*petsc; /* app[i] is the partner for the ith PETSc slot */
/* petsc[j] is the partner for the jth app slot */
} AO_Basic;
Barry
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On 8/27/07, Barry
Yes, definitely. Go ahead and push it.
Matt
On 8/28/07, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
Does it make sense to change KSPSkipConverged to return
KSP_CONVERGED_ITS if iternum==maxit ?
KSP_DIVERGED_ITS means convergence failure, but IMHO, KSPSkipConverged
should not imply
On 8/28/07, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On 8/28/07, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
Yes, definitely. Go ahead and push it.
I started to try this by implementing first on petsc4py with
petsc-2.3.3-p4, by solving a trivial SPD diagonal system { A_ii =
1/(i+1
On 8/28/07, Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com wrote:
On 8/28/07, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
Todd's response was that there are reasons it can stop early, like happy
breakdown, so we really need to test this with the dev version to track
down this behavior.
OK, my tests
Thats awesome. 80% true efficiency for 1K nodes on under
1 million unknowns. Thats only 1,000 unknowns per proc. If
we were cranking the problems size, I am sure you'd be up
in the 90s. Hopefully this summer we can deliver you much
improved serial performance as well. BTW, I want to talk
sometime
S V N Vishwanathan vishy at mail.rsise.anu.edu.au writes:
Hi!
I am tying myself up in knots in trying to figure out your BuildSystem
and how to adapt it to LINEAL. PETSc is one primary component of LINEAL
but going forward there will be others (viz. TAO, OOQP).
I want that my users should
S V N Vishwanathan vishy at mail.rsise.anu.edu.au writes:
Ideally, I would like to use your BuildSystem to hack up a quick build
for Numerix. Then as we add and integrate more tools in, I would work on
making it fancier.
Cool, we can do that.
Here is the plan I came up with (after
Simon Burton simon at arrowtheory.com writes:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:49:46 -0600
Matthew Knepley knepley at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Simon Burton simon at arrowtheory.com writes:
This was patched in 2.3.0, but maybe you have an unpatched version. It
is
easy to check. The symbol comes
Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov writes:
Should we inline VecSetValues, MatSetValues, and friends?
If
1) at least gcc supports it (we will have to maintain the #define for
those that are not C99 I think)
2) gdb handles it
I also have another proposal. Dmitry and I are going
Simon Burton simon at arrowtheory.com writes:
Hi,
Along the lines of python's numarray [1], we need some way of
operating pointwise (and inner/outer operations) on Mat/Vec objects.
In particular, we need things like the following:
(a) v=add.reduce(m) (sum along rows/cols of a Mat to
S V N Vishwanathan vishy at mail.rsise.anu.edu.au writes:
Hi!
BTW: possibly related note, are you using dense matrices sometimes
to represent just 2-arrays; that is, not as representations of linear
operators. If so, I do not think this is the correct approach! Conceptually
PETSc Mat's are
Simon Burton simon at arrowtheory.com writes:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:57:02 -0500
Matthew Knepley knepley at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
(d) m=exp(m) (pointwise exp)
We could add pointwise operations just like the VecPointwise*().
Matt
Yes, we need MatPointwiseMult
Simon Burton simon at arrowtheory.com writes:
Oh, that should probably read:
exp( -1/2\sigma^{2} ||x1_{i} - x2_{j}||_{2}^{2})
And when we vectorize this operation:
||x1_i - x2_j||^2 = ||x1_i||^2 + ||x2_i||^2 + 2*(x1_i,x2_j)
and the last term is the ip matrix.
It seems that this
Aron Ahmadia aron.ahmadia at gmail.com writes:
So this is really crappy news, I really liked BK. How is this going to
affect PETSc and what are your future short-term and long-term plans?
I have to figure out what I'm doing with COW, and I was wondering how you
guys were dealing with this.
Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov writes:
After endless futzing I've gotten --download-prometheus working
with both --with-clanguage=C and C++ with petsc-dev on my Mac. Should work
everywhere :-).
Satish, could you try adding it to a nightly build? You also need
--download-parmetis
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:28 PM, John Mousel john.mousel at gmail.com wrote:
I just pulled petsc-dev and am getting the following error in the tests.
Pushed fix.
Matt
John
Running test examples to verify correct installation
Using
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Cinstance cinstance at gmail.com wrote:
I am using PETSC as the linear solver for a CFD project. It is part of an
integrated frame work, and the project is developed under MS Windows.
I use PETSC as prebuild libs in Visual Studio, so I cannot debug into
PETSC
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Yoo, Andy yoo2 at llnl.gov wrote:
Hi,
** **
I have written a two-dimensional MatVec routine (
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2063469) a while ago.
Any chance of getting that into PETSc proper?
Now, I am noticing there is a small memory leak
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Alexander Grayver
agrayver at gfz-potsdam.dewrote:
Hello,
I use KSP and random rhs to compute largest singular value:
1) Is this the whole program? If not, this can be caused by memory
corruption somewhere else. This is what I suspect.
2) You can put in
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Alexander Grayver
agrayver at gfz-potsdam.dewrote:
**
On 06.05.2012 14:27, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Alexander Grayver agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de
wrote:
Hello,
I use KSP and random rhs to compute largest singular value:
1
is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
On 06.05.2012 15:21, Alexander Grayver wrote:
On 06.05.2012 15:07, Matthew Knepley wrote:
Hello,
I use KSP and random rhs to compute largest singular value:
1) Is this the whole program? If not, this can be caused by memory
corruption
That sounds fine to me.
Matt
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Should the refinement level be copied over by DMCoarsen (and the coarsen
level be copied by DMRefine)?
It's useful for diagnostics to be able to define a universal level. If I
use PCMG
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Now the next round:
For semi-coarsening, we used to have stuff like -da_refine_hierarchy_x
1,1,3 -da_refine_hierarchy_y 2,2,1 -da_refine_hierarchy_z 2,2,1. Two
changes make this harder now:
1. You essentially got rid
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Matt introduced this concept, he says the IS is a better place to attach
things.
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/2ad289ac99e0
I don't understand why the IS is better (because it's mostly immutable?).
I'm
is the right thing to do. It allows other people to stick their own stuff
in place of ours easily, without junking it up with a lots of
wrapper objects.
Matt
Barry
On May 6, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote
, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Alexander Grayveragrayver at gfz-potsdam.
**de agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de wrote:
Hm, valgrind gives a lot of output like that (see full log in previous
message):
Can you run this with --download-f-blas-lapack? This sounds much more
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Chetan Jhurani chetan.jhurani at
gmail.comwrote:
Hi wizards of -ops- indirections,
I'm trying to use bcgs without preconditioning, for now, and
the iterations using -vec_type cusp -mat_type mpiaijcusp don't
match serial or non-GPU options. I've attached the
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sean Farley sean at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
It would seem to me that the best way to fix this is to just spell his
name the way he did: ? ???. All we need to do is
http://www.250bpm.com/blog:4
Matt
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
*- ptr - pointer to a structure that must have a DM as its first entry.*
*This ptr must have been passed into SNESDMComputeFunction() as
the context.*
This is considered very bad form now since
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Blaise Bourdin bourdin at lsu.edu wrote:
Hi,
ex19 in src/vec/vec/examples/tutorials is still broken, since changing
block size of a Vec is no longer supported.
the mechanism in VecLoad_HDF5 was to rely on an undocumented flag
(-vecload_block_size)
Shall we
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Aron Ahmadia aron at ahmadia.net wrote:
http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/2303/petscs-xxxsetxxx-methods-own-pointer-or-copy-values
My understanding is that Set for the most part acts like a
pass-by-reference, and my answer reflects that (
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Absolutely. And if it turns out to be too much of a pain to write and
maintain such a kernel there is something wrong with our programming model
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Building PETSc with clang++ produces a warning about compiling *.c as C++
being deprecated. To silence the warning, we would need to pass -x c++ to
the compiler, but NOT to the linker. CFLAGS is currently also passed to
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Sarcasm on --
Yes, of course. It is essentially done, write it up and I want it on my
desk by 8 AM Friday.
-- Sarcasm off
So what if
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Because of the tetgen license we cannot include ctetgen directly in the
PETSc tarball. Thus we have forked it off into its own repository and it
is available for users as --download-ctetgen Developers may choose
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
The OpenMP flags do not definitively identify that OpenMP is used. In
particular, IBM XL interprets Cray's option -h omp as being equivalent to
-soname omp, then silently ignores the Open MP pragmas. We can perhaps
fix
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Fredrik,
This question belongs on petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov since it involves
additions/extensions to PETSc so I am moving the discussion over to there.
We have not done the required work to have ghosted
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 20:35, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
VecCreate()
VecSetType()
VecSetGhosted()
Is there a compelling reason for memory to be allocated before VecSetUp()?
Deferring it would make
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the ghosting flag be on the same
level as the sizes
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Sean Farley sean at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Yoo, i've switched petsc-dev over to bitbucket since petsc.cs.itt.edu is
down pull/push from https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev
Sean - Barry impersonating me
I have pushed to bring it up to date with the latest
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 04:19, Peter Brune prbrune at gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Suppose I want to solve a finite time step problem using FAS. The time
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 08:57, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out that Jed envisions that coefficients (and maybe
subproblems, etc) cannot be accommodated on the
same DM. I agree
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
I'm sure Jed (or Matt in his prime) could have run over to IIT and
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Sean Farley sean at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
There is only a 1-level hierarchy based on a top level account. Sean
created 'petsc' for our stuff. We can create many, so that
we have 'petsc-release', 'petsc-private', etc. if we want. Of course, I
want traditional
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Sean Farley sean at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
No I mean I want
petsc/releases/petsc-3.1
petsc/tools/parsing/BarrysNewHTMLMunger
Sounds like you want a traditional filesystem hierarchy and like I said
before, your request will fall on deaf ears. This is the
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Alexander Grayver
agrayver at gfz-potsdam.dewrote:
**
lib/petsc-dev hg pull -u
pulling from http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev
searching for changes
no changes found
Does it take some time till it's there?
You have to remake Fortran stubs: make
Clearly, karpeev was the only use who altered those lines:
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/rev/42cbb1d6192f
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/annotate/d295489bd56e/config/packages/MOAB.py
Matt
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Sean Farley wrote:
Hell, if you *really* want to, just create the account:
petsc-release(s)
then the URL would be
http://bitbucket.org/petsc-release/petsc-3.1
Actually, it's even
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Jed Brown wrote:
It's all workable,
but I'm not seeing a clear advantage to keeping the primary at
petsc.cs.iit.edu,
currently the 2 reasons that are offered agains petsc.cs.iit.edu are:
- ssh
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Dmitry Karpeev karpeev at mcs.anl.govwrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 23:55, Dmitry Karpeev karpeev at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
In a somewhat related matter, it appears that I cannot
The thread has become too deep for me to read, hence the top posting.
Barry's question is the right one: What do we gain by changing?
1) Reliability and Availability
Barry, you should know that this crap about petsc.cs being backed up is
farcical. We
would have the same situation we had
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
The thread has become too deep for me to read, hence the top posting.
Barry's question is the right one: What do we gain by changing?
1) Reliability
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:
On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
The thread has become too deep for me to read, hence the top posting.
Barry's question is the right one: What do
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Matt,
until we move to bitbucket - can you continue to push to petsc.cs.iit
- and not bitbucket? [for now - pushes to petsc.cs.iit are
automatically pushed to bitbucket]
I thought we were switched already :) I cannot
101 - 200 of 2694 matches
Mail list logo
