On 12/3/18 5:43 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:35 PM Mills, Richard Tran via petsc-dev
mailto:petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Sorry, everyone, for how long it took me to have time to get back to this. I
tried the change I suggested in my previous message, but configure fails
Sorry, everyone, for how long it took me to have time to get back to this. I
tried the change I suggested in my previous message, but configure fails with
***
UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS(see
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 6:12 PM, Mills, Richard Tran via petsc-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Apologies for the slow reply; I was out for the US Thanksgiving Holiday.
>
> You've found an error in the logic for the MKL configure tests: Your MKL does
> indeed have mkl_sparse_sp2m(), but
Oh, I should also have asked: Why are you telling PETSc to not use
mkl_sparse_optimize()? Does it cause some sort of problem if you build with
that on?
--Richard
On 11/21/18 10:59 PM, Stefano Zampini wrote:
Richard,
I just noticed that PETSc master does not build with the options
Hi Stefano,
Apologies for the slow reply; I was out for the US Thanksgiving Holiday.
You've found an error in the logic for the MKL configure tests: Your MKL does
indeed have mkl_sparse_sp2m(), but since this depends on having
mkl_sparse_optimize() and you have specified