Add TSSetFromOptions(ts_solver) before TSSolve(). Please let us know if it
works.
Hong
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Paul Urbanczyk wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> See below for my initial code, before adding TSSetExactFinalTime.
>
> That version yielded the following error:
>
>
I do not think that it is possible to have a "left preconditioned" FMGRES.
Barry
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Fande Kong wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Any reasons to let fgmres do not support left preconditioner? In theory,
> fgmres should with left preconditioner.
OK, this makes sense.
Now my libMesh code use SerialMesh, which keeps a copy on each processor,
although the operation is parallelized. So it requires more memory if
multiple CPUs are used. This may be a potential culprit. But I suppose the
60x60x60 mesh data(all second order) shouldn't be so
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Xujun Zhao wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> Thank you. I am testing on the blues.
> btw, what do they mean for the different types of memory usage? for example,
> below is the summary of mem usage for 60x60x60(with 2.9M dofs). The max
> process memory
Barry,
Thank you. I am testing on the blues.
btw, what do they mean for the different types of memory usage? for
example, below is the summary of mem usage for 60x60x60(with 2.9M dofs).
The max process memory is 3 times as the max space PetscMalloc()ed.
Summary of Memory Usage in PETSc
Maximum
Hi all,
Any reasons to let fgmres do not support left preconditioner? In theory,
fgmres should with left preconditioner. Please correct me, if I am wrong.
Fande Kong,
[0]PETSC ERROR: - Error Message
--
[0]PETSC
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Xujun Zhao wrote:
>
> A quick test of a smaller system on my laptop with 25x25x25 mesh gives the
> following info.
> The memory used keeps increasing from 1 to 3 CPUs, but slightly decreases
> with 4 CPUs.
yes this does not look problematic
A quick test of a smaller system on my laptop with 25x25x25 mesh gives the
following info.
The memory used keeps increasing from 1 to 3 CPUs, but slightly decreases
with 4 CPUs.
On the other hand, 60x60x60 mesh (2.9M dofs) is also not a big system...
Email account Locked Temporarily This email account is locked temporarily
because of security concerns. Please click here to reactivate account. Support
Hi Lawrence and Matt,
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Rongliang
On 06/08/2016 04:36 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Rongliang Chen > wrote:
Hi Matt,
I tried your suggestions but I still can not get
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Rongliang Chen wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I tried your suggestions but I still can not get the refined Vertex Sets.
> What I am doing looks like this:
> ---
> if (!rank) {
>
Put
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 06:45, Rongliang Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> I tried your suggestions but I still can not get the refined Vertex Sets.
> What I am doing looks like this:
> ---
> if (!rank) {
>
12 matches
Mail list logo