CMake likes to specifically check that all include directories passed to it
exist. PETSc does not
foreach(dir ${TPL_PARMETIS_INCLUDE_DIRS})
if (NOT EXISTS ${dir})
message(FATAL_ERROR "PARMETIS include directory not found: ${dir}")
endif()
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-I${dir}
ls -ld
/apps/local/easybuild/software/impi/2018.3.222-iccifort-2018.3.222-GCC-7.3.0-2.30/intel64/include
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 3:18 PM, Fande Kong via petsc-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to compile PETSc with "--download-superlu_dist" using an intel
> compiler. I have
attached zip file has the same/old configure.log
Can you use PETSC_ARCH=arch-test - so that the old build files are not
reused, and resend the new configure.log
Satish
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Fande Kong via petsc-users wrote:
> No, I hit exactly the same error using your script.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Fande Kong via petsc-users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to compile PETSc with "--download-superlu_dist" using an intel
> compiler. I have explored with different options, but did not get PETSc
> built successfully so far. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> The log file
Sounds good, i will take a look. Thanks!
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, 12:28 Nathan Collier,
wrote:
> Here is a example of what I think you need:
>
>
> https://github.com/TDycores-Project/toy-problems/blob/master/TracyProblem/Richards.c
>
> It is written to solve Richard's equation using a simple
Thank you very much for your reply. As a user, if I define a physical group
named "right" in Gmsh, I also would like to access it by using this name in
DMPlex. It could be convenient and understandable for the user. I think it
would be nice if you guys can add this translation table. Thanks a
Hi all,
I have a mesh file where I defined a physical group named "volume" whose id is
0.
For DMPlex, I know that I can use this id (0) to access this physical group.
Here I would like to ask that is it possible to use the physical group name
"volume" to achieve this in DMPlex. Thank you very
Hi,
I am on the way to write a program in python where I need parallel high
order interpolation.
I saw there exists “createInterpolation(self, DM dm)”, but this seems to
be accurate only for constant functions. Is there a way to get a higher
order interpolation matrix? If it does not exist maybe
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:07 AM Edoardo alinovi via petsc-users <
petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Hello PETSc users and developers,
> I hope you are doing well! Today I have a general question about DMplex to
> see if it can be usefull to me or not.
>
> I have my fancy finite volume solver
