Yeah! I think! You are completely right! Thanks for your suggestion. I would
definitely look at them!
Thanks
Amir
From: Matthew Knepley [mailto:knep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 2:25 AM
To: Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
Cc: PETSc
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Global Numbering
Knepley [mailto:knep...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2018 1:45 AM
> *To:* Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
> *Cc:* PETSc
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Global Numbering
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Mohammad Hassan Baghaei <
> mhbagh...@mail.sjtu.edu.cn> w
: Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
Cc: PETSc
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Global Numbering
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
mailto:mhbagh...@mail.sjtu.edu.cn> > wrote:
I am trying to fill a vector based on global coordinate.
You can see how this might be too vague for me to
haei
> *Cc:* PETSc
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Global Numbering
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Mohammad Hassan Baghaei <
> mhbagh...@mail.sjtu.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am trying to create a global vector of coordinates based on the
> parall
, March 21, 2018 10:38 PM
To: Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
Cc: PETSc
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Global Numbering
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Mohammad Hassan Baghaei
mailto:mhbagh...@mail.sjtu.edu.cn> > wrote:
Hello
I am trying to create a global vector of coordinates based
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Mohammad Hassan Baghaei <
mhbagh...@mail.sjtu.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to create a global vector of coordinates based on the
> parallelized dm. I find it really hard to work with the local numbering,
> how can I manage to create a kind of numbering on
Hello
I am trying to create a global vector of coordinates based on the
parallelized dm. I find it really hard to work with the local numbering, how
can I manage to create a kind of numbering on global level so that I could
easily access to the nodes based on the new numbering. Thanks for your tim
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 17:25, Mohammad Mirzadeh wrote:
> Just to make sure though, is my assumption on the natural ordering of
> PETSc correct?
Yes, but please don't write code that depends on that. It's plenty easy to
query the local size or the sizes/starts of other processes.
--
Thanks Jed for the advice. Actually I looked at the code and I think this
was the only place I had made this implicit assumption (but the most
important place). As a matter of fact, I make my vectors layout according
to the AO that I get from partitioning. I think my main mistake was that I
had ass
On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Mohammad Mirzadeh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using 'ISPartitioningToNumbering' to generate new global numbering from
> a partitioning indexset and I'm baffled at the following situation. I'm
> debugging my code on a simple grid consisting of 81 grid points partitioned
Aaah! Thanks Barry. Just to make sure though, is my assumption on the
natural ordering of PETSc correct?
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Mohammad Mirzadeh wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using 'ISPartitioningToNumbering' to generate new g
Hi,
I am using 'ISPartitioningToNumbering' to generate new global numbering
from a partitioning indexset and I'm baffled at the following situation.
I'm debugging my code on a simple grid consisting of 81 grid points
partitioned among two processes. When I look into the partitioning indexset
(i.e
12 matches
Mail list logo
