Re: [petsc-users] Clarification on PCASMSetLocalSubdomain is and is_local

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat wrote: > Ok I get it, then if I have multiple subdomains on the local processor is > and is_local will be arrays of is that represent each subdomain on that > processor? > Yep. Matt > Best, > Luc > > On 06/02/2016

Re: [petsc-users] Clarification on PCASMSetLocalSubdomain is and is_local

Ok I get it, then if I have multiple subdomains on the local processor is and is_local will be arrays of is that represent each subdomain on that processor? Best, Luc On 06/02/2016 06:21 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat

Re: [petsc-users] Clarification on PCASMSetLocalSubdomain is and is_local

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat wrote: > Hi all, > I would like a quick clarification on what is and is_local are > representing in the PCASMSetLocalSubdomains(). > My understanding is that if I have two mpi ranks and four subdomains I can > end up having

[petsc-users] Clarification on PCASMSetLocalSubdomain is and is_local

Hi all, I would like a quick clarification on what is and is_local are representing in the PCASMSetLocalSubdomains(). My understanding is that if I have two mpi ranks and four subdomains I can end up having four blocks that I can denote as follows: | domain1 | domain2 |

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

Re, Makes sense to read the documentation, I will try with another preconditioners. Thanks for the support. 2016-06-02 18:15 GMT+02:00 Matthew Knepley : > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, neok m4700 wrote: > >> Hi Satish, >> >> Thanks for the

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, neok m4700 wrote: > Hi Satish, > > Thanks for the correction. > > The error message is now slightly different, but the result is the same > (serial runs fine, parallel with mpirun fails with following error): > Now the error is correct. You

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

Hi Satish, Thanks for the correction. The error message is now slightly different, but the result is the same (serial runs fine, parallel with mpirun fails with following error): [0] KSPSolve() line 599 in <...>/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c [0] KSPSetUp() line 390 in

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

with petsc-master - you would have to use petsc4py-master. i.e try petsc-eab7b92 with petsc4py-6e8e093 Satish On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, neok m4700 wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > I've rebuilt petsc // petsc4py with following versions: > > 3.7.0 // 3.7.0 => same runtime error > 00c67f3 // 3.7.1 => fails

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

Hi Matthew, I've rebuilt petsc // petsc4py with following versions: 3.7.0 // 3.7.0 => same runtime error 00c67f3 // 3.7.1 => fails to build petsc4py (error below) 00c67f3 // 6e8e093 => same as above f1b0812 (latest commit) // 6e8e093 (latest commit) => same as above In file included from

Re: [petsc-users] (no subject)

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:12 AM, neok m4700 wrote: > Hi, > > I built petsc 3.7.1 and petsc4py 3.7.0 (with openmpi 1.10.2) and ran the > examples in the demo directory. > I believe this was fixed in 'master':

[petsc-users] (no subject)

Hi, I built petsc 3.7.1 and petsc4py 3.7.0 (with openmpi 1.10.2) and ran the examples in the demo directory. $ python test_mat_ksp.py => runs as expected (serial) $ mpiexec -np 2 python test_mat_ksp.py => fails with the following output: Traceback (most recent call last): File