On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 11:25 -0700, Jed Brown wrote:
> Garth Wells writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote:
> > > No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc
> > > developers
> > > use
> > > VecSetV
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote:
> No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc developers
> use
> VecSetValues* because VecScatter is a more natural interface with
> lower
> overhead.
>
Any demos of its recommended use?
Garth
>
Is there a reason why there is no 'VecGetLocalSubVector' to match
MatGetLocalSubMatrix?
I've used VecGetSubVector, but can't use local indices with it, e.g.
can't use VecSetValuesLocal.
Garth
