Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method

2024-03-03 Thread Zou, Ling via petsc-users
From: Jed Brown Date: Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 9:24 PM To: Zou, Ling , petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method One option is to form the preconditioner using the FV1 method, which is sparser and satisfies h-ellipticity, while using FV2

Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method

2024-03-03 Thread Jed Brown
One option is to form the preconditioner using the FV1 method, which is sparser and satisfies h-ellipticity, while using FV2 for the residual and (optionally) for matrix-free operator application. FV1 is a highly diffusive method so in a sense, ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method

2024-03-03 Thread Zou, Ling via petsc-users
Thank you, Mark. This is encouraging! I will give it a try and report back. -Ling From: Mark Adams Date: Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM To: Zou, Ling Cc: petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11: 42 AM Zou

Re: [petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method

2024-03-03 Thread Mark Adams
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:42 AM Zou, Ling via petsc-users < petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Original email may have been sent to the incorrect place. > > See below. > > > > -Ling > > > > *From: *Zou, Ling > *Date: *Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:34 AM > *To: *petsc-users > *Subject:

[petsc-users] FW: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method

2024-03-03 Thread Zou, Ling via petsc-users
Original email may have been sent to the incorrect place. See below. -Ling From: Zou, Ling Date: Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:34 AM To: petsc-users Subject: 'Preconditioning' with lower-order method Hi all, I am solving a PDE system over a spatial domain. Numerical methods are: * Finite