Re: [petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

Garth Wells writes: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 11:25 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: >> Garth Wells writes: >> >> > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: >> > > No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc >> > > developers >> > > use >> > >

Re: [petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 11:25 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: > Garth Wells writes: > > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: > > > No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc > > > developers > > > use > > > VecSetValues* because VecScatter is a more natural

Re: [petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

Garth Wells writes: > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: >> No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc developers >> use >> VecSetValues* because VecScatter is a more natural interface with >> lower >> overhead. >> > > Any demos of its recommended

Re: [petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:13 -0700, Jed Brown wrote: > No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc developers > use > VecSetValues* because VecScatter is a more natural interface with > lower > overhead. > Any demos of its recommended use? Garth > Garth Wells

Re: [petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

No reason, just didn't need it. I don't think any PETSc developers use VecSetValues* because VecScatter is a more natural interface with lower overhead. Garth Wells writes: > Is there a reason why there is no 'VecGetLocalSubVector' to match > MatGetLocalSubMatrix? > > I've

[petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

Is there a reason why there is no 'VecGetLocalSubVector' to match MatGetLocalSubMatrix? I've used VecGetSubVector, but can't use local indices with it, e.g. can't use VecSetValuesLocal. Garth