Thanks, it is working fine.
Mark
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:12 PM Jed Brown wrote:
> This default probably shouldn't be zero, and probably lengthening steps
> should be more gentle after a recent failure. But Mark, please let us know
> if what's there works for you.
>
> "Zhang, Hong via
This default probably shouldn't be zero, and probably lengthening steps should
be more gentle after a recent failure. But Mark, please let us know if what's
there works for you.
"Zhang, Hong via petsc-users" writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> You might want to try -ts_adapt_time_step_increase_delay to
Hi Mark,
You might want to try -ts_adapt_time_step_increase_delay to delay increasing
the time step after it has been decreased due to a failed solve.
Hong (Mr.)
> On Jan 2, 2023, at 12:17 PM, Mark Adams wrote:
>
> I am using arkimex and the logic with a failed KSP solve is puzzling. This
>
