On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 07:02:52PM -0500, Marina Brown wrote:
>Will binat and altq work with authpf in the coming release ? I am
> planning a wireless network that will use authpf to limit users. I would
> like VERY much to be able to load altq rules for each user.
As for binat, yes, you can
Hi All:
Will binat and altq work with authpf in the coming release ? I am
planning a wireless network that will use authpf to limit users. I would
like VERY much to be able to load altq rules for each user.
Marina Brown
--
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 03:31:56PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> Is there any way for the firewall administrator to see just the states
> that authpf has created, or just the rules that authpf has created?
The first one is a little tricky, as there's only a single state table
where all states go,
Yes, it's rude to follow up on myself, but I'm being drowned by email:
See http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/openbsd.html if you want
to know about the book. Please don't mail me with "when will it be
out" and suchforth, I'll just point you there.
==ml
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 03:49:55PM
Hello,
As some on this list know, I'm writing a book on OpenBSD.
Most of the book I can test myself -- I can sit and build ports and do
installs all day long, after all. The sections on PF are a little
more problematical, however, as I don't exactly have a wide variety of
real networks to muck a
Hello,
Is there any way for the firewall administrator to see just the states
that authpf has created, or just the rules that authpf has created?
If I run "pfctl -s authpf", I get complete information on the anchor
and the states, but nothing on rules.
if I run "pfctl -a authpf -s authpf," I get
Confirmed fixed here, thanks!
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> Both crashes in -current reported by Joe and Michael should be fixed now
> in -current, and the changes should have propagated to the cvs mirrors
> by now. I'd like to thank you for testing -current a
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 06:28:14PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> Following does not work (on -current from today, btw)
>
> EXTIF="xl0"
> EXTIP="{ 10.0.3.20, 10.1.3.20, 10.2.3.20 }"
> block out log quick on $EXTIF from ! $EXTIP to any
>
> root@hellspawn:/root# pfctl -f pf.conf
> pf.conf:3: synta
Following does not work (on -current from today, btw)
EXTIF="xl0"
EXTIP="{ 10.0.3.20, 10.1.3.20, 10.2.3.20 }"
block out log quick on $EXTIF from ! $EXTIP to any
root@hellspawn:/root# pfctl -f pf.conf
pf.conf:3: syntax error
If I remove the !, no problem. This is not normal, right?
// haver
I also tried tircproxy with no success.
James
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Scircuit wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get established outgoing dcc connections with pf? I tried
>out tircproxy, but I am looking for an alternative.
>
> Jon
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
