Re: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-12 Thread Volker Kindermann
Hi Trevor, As I don't have a PPPoE setup to work with, I did my own testing with just tun0, and saw the spin effect. Below is a patch for if_tun.c, which fixed the problem I observed. I'd like to know if it fixes pppoe queueing for anyone brave enough to try patches from me. it works

Re: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Philipp Buehler
On 10/06/2003, Tobias Wigand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: same here, works great with a saturated link. i can upload with full speed and it doesn´t slow down my downloads at all! okay, surfing around while uploading is slower than normal, but thats something we have to live

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Primo Gabrijeli
Great! Hopefully this will hold for everyone else who's testing it. same here, works great with a saturated link. i can upload with full speed and it doesnt slow down my downloads at all! okay, surfing around while uploading is slower than normal, but thats something we have to live with,

Re: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:38:45PM +0200, Primo? Gabrijel?i? wrote: Great! Hopefully this will hold for everyone else who's testing it. same here, works great with a saturated link. i can upload with full speed and it doesn´t slow down my downloads at all! okay, surfing around while

Re: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:07:09PM +0200, Primo? Gabrijel?i? wrote: Henning Brauer wrote ... After all positive feedback - is there any chance we can see this submitted to -stable? I think quite some people would applaud to that. I intend to get that into -current soonish.

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Primo Gabrijeli
Henning Brauer wrote ... After all positive feedback - is there any chance we can see this submitted to -stable? I think quite some people would applaud to that. I intend to get that into -current soonish. it's not really a -stable thing - only bugfixes go to

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Primo Gabrijeli
Henning Brauer wrote ... why not just run -current ;-) Because I also run few mailing lists and intend to minimize downtime on that computer. IOW, I am also very very conservative :-) but for updating to latest stable you need one reboot anyway - so why not just apply the

Re: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-10 Thread Trevor Talbot
On Tuesday, Jun 10, 2003, at 05:07 US/Pacific, Tobias Wigand wrote: same here, works great with a saturated link. i can upload with full speed and it doesn´t slow down my downloads at all! Great! okay, surfing around while uploading is slower than normal, but thats something we have to live

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-09 Thread Primo Gabrijeli
Trevor Talbot wrote ... I did some playing around and discovered something. It seems that someone forgot to fully ALTQify tun0. Specifically, select() always returns read-ready if there's any data in the internal queue, whether ALTQ's discipline is ready to release it or not. The

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-07 Thread Amir Seyavash Mesry
So, let me ask, is the if_tun.c file supplied compat with 3.3 and does it require the kernel sources only, or the whole source tree? Amir Seyavash Mesry [EMAIL PROTECTED] LSI Logic Corporation http://www.lsilogic.com/ Raid Support Test Technician 6145-D Northbelt Parkway Norcross, GA 30071

RE: altq vs pppoe

2003-06-07 Thread Amir Seyavash Mesry
, 2003 8:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: altq vs pppoe On Saturday, Jun 7, 2003, at 14:52 US/Pacific, Amir Seyavash Mesry wrote: So, let me ask, is the if_tun.c file supplied compat with 3.3 and does it require the kernel sources only, or the whole source tree? I think sending