Thanks Peter and mouss for the replies.
But I'm still puzzled. I read the description of the rdr directive a
number of times and looked at some of the examples but it's still not
clear to me how the above proxy and portmap subcommands translate into
pf's rdr command. It really looks like there is
we have two Pentium III Xeon, OpenBSD 3.8 boxes running pf in transparent
bridging mode on our primary and backup Internet links, which is currently fed
via an OC-3 (155Mbps) connection to the Internet. On an average day we run
70Mbps/50Mbps (14K pps/13K pps) in/out.
after upgrading to OpenBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Peter and mouss for the replies.
Oh, you're welcome,
But I'm still puzzled. I read the description of the rdr directive a
number of times and looked at some of the examples but it's still not
clear to me how the above proxy and portmap subcommands translate
On Friday, Mar 24, 2006, at 05:27 US/Pacific, Daniel Dias Gonçalves
wrote:
I use the following rules in the IPFW:
$fwcmd add 100 pipe 13 ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to any in
$fwcmd add 101 pipe 14 ip from any to 192.168.0.0/24 out
$fwcmd pipe 13 config mask src-ip 0x00ff bw 150Kbit/s queue
On 3 Apr 2006 22:56:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Peter and mouss for the replies.
But I'm still puzzled. I read the description of the rdr directive a
number of times and looked at some of the examples but it's still not
clear to me how the above proxy and portmap subcommands
On Sunday, Apr 2, 2006, at 00:26 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a document that describes how to translate common IPFilter
constructs to pf? This would be helpful for people migrating (like
me). Specifically, I'm looking for the pf equivalent of IPFilter's
map $ext_if
* Per-Olov Sj?holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-31 18:11]:
Can PF make use of SMP?
no.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ...
