Okay, I think I found some stuff on the Vonage site
that gave me clues as to why I got the results in my
testing. Please you pf gurus, can you give me feedback?
Below is the testing I did (from previous message for
background), and I found that maybe I am not getting
the pf function when I have the
I really need help with a pf application.
I am trying to solve a problem on a friend's
network and it looks to me like pf would be a
wonderful solution, and some feedback was
positive that it should work. But first test
did not give good result. Here is the story.
First the setup:
3 Computers on
Hi Cedric.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Cedric Berger wrote:
> No, i386 current pmap support is very poor, and won't allow you to
> reliably allocate more than 64M of RAM.
Thanks for the clarification.
What is the highest safe value I should raise NMBCLUSTERS to on x86? How
No, i386 current pmap support is very poor, and won't allow you to
reliably allocate more than 64M of RAM.
You might be more lucky with sparc64 or amd64.
Cedric
Jon Mosco wrote:
Yes. option NMBCLUSTERS=N , where N is the number of clusters.
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq11.html#Network
Yes. option NMBCLUSTERS=N , where N is the number of clusters.
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq11.html#Network
Jon
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:02:46 +0059
Jedi/Sector One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is there any kernel parameter like NMBCLUSTERS or NKMEMPAGES to increase
> in
Hello.
Is there any kernel parameter like NMBCLUSTERS or NKMEMPAGES to increase
in order to let pf work with millions of states? The host has 1Gb ram and
does nothing but transparent firewalling.
TIA,
--
__ /*-Frank DENIS (Jedi/Sector One) -*\ __
\ '/http://www.PureFTPd.
I have a single file being used by relaydb. It contains whitelist and
blacklist.
Currently running pf fine with a spamd table containing many spam addresses.
Using spamd-setup wtih RBL list and local spamassasin entries.
How do I delete an IP from the blacklist ?
How do I add an IP to the whit
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:23:53AM -0700, Tim Pushor wrote:
> I am still testing the ramifications of my patch, and like I said, I'm
> not really a network programming guru, but if anyone wants it, they are
> free to have it.
If it solves your problem, please send me a patch. I'll review it if
Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
Passive/active can be ambiguous, for the client passive mode means the
clients connects to the server for data connections. But from your
further description I think you mean data connections from the server to
the client, right?
Yes, that is correct.
As I understand yo
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:49:48PM -0700, Tim Pushor wrote:
> The problem is that I have a FTP server on inside that I am trying to
> get ftp-proxy (with the reverse patch on benzedrine) to proxy into, but
> I'm having trouble with active ftp. Passive works fine.
Passive/active can be ambiguous
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:47:17PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> We have one client (more to come, wich is why this is a bit
> of a concern) that has very high packet/second
> rate while the actual bitrate is fairly low (small VOIP packets) and
> Am I missing something obvious here, or is cbq no
I have a OpenBSd box acting a s traffic shaper for a couple of clients
and it is experience some, shall we say, odd
"problems". We have one client (more to come, wich is why this is a bit
of a concern) that has very high packet/second
rate while the actual bitrate is fairly low (small VOIP packet
12 matches
Mail list logo