[pgadmin-hackers] pga3 todo

2003-03-27 Thread efesar
Dave, Speaking of the TODO list. Can you add me into the TODO for the Query Builder? PS, it's nice to see new people helping out with PGA3. I know several people who are looking forward to this tool when it's done. -Keith ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] can't compile

2003-03-27 Thread efesar
Dave, Sorry, I don't know how I missed this. I might be getting .NET Studio Professional, and hopefully I will be able to reproduce at least part of the problem. My compiler switches: C++: /nologo /MD /W3 /GX /O2 /Ob2 /I "include/" /I "c:/wxWindows_2.4.0/include" /I "c:/wxWindows_2.4.0/cont

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 March 2003 11:36 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3 > > > I'm tracking this list since Jan 24, haven't seen something about > cacheing. Did I miss it? > I

[pgadmin-hackers] WARNING: CVS Server potential downtime

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
Hi all, I won't go into the long and complex story, but due to a mistake by the ISP who provide the connection to the pgAdmin CVS server, there are likely to connection issues over the next week or so whilst the leased line is changed twice(!). Apologies for any inconvenience this may cause... R

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question?

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 March 2003 12:50 > To: Dave Page > Cc: jm.poure; pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question?

2003-03-27 Thread frank_lupo
> > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 27 March 2003 09:08 > > To: pgadmin-hackers > > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question? > > > > > > Le Mercredi 26 Mars 2003 23:12, Dave Page a écrit : > > > I think the idea here was to cr

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3

2003-03-27 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: OK, that's an ambitious statement. I'll look forward to seeing the results. I'll send you something as soon as it works Still as I said, I'm not prepared to give out CVS write access upon request - I doubt very much you will find any serious project that does. Sure. I would also

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 March 2003 11:10 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3 > > > Hi Dave, > > what I'm doing now can't be possibly called a patch... You won't hear > from me in

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3

2003-03-27 Thread Andreas Pflug
Hi Dave, what I'm doing now can't be possibly called a patch... You won't hear from me in this list until pgAdmin3 can browse and execute as pgAdmin2 does I'll be back soon. Regards, Andreas Dave Page wrote: Excellent. Any contributions would be gratefully received... I'm happy to gra

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
Hi Andreas, > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 March 2003 01:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Work on pgAdmin3 > > > At the moment, there seems to be not much work in progress on > pgAdmin3? Unfortunately my time is

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question?

2003-03-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 March 2003 09:08 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question? > > > Le Mercredi 26 Mars 2003 23:12, Dave Page a écrit : > > I think the idea here was to create something similar

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] todo question?

2003-03-27 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mercredi 26 Mars 2003 23:12, Dave Page a écrit : > I think the idea here was to create something similar to Oracle > packages(?). Jean-Michel, do you remember the details - I think that > was you one wasn't it? This was before schema was introduced. The idea was to be able to group objects an