Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Dave Page
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Well, I meant that you would select two things: >  * Base Type (List control) e.g. Integer >  * Array or Not (Radio Button) e.g. Non-Array > which would then result in a non-array Integer. So the radio button > alters the meaning of the item

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 20:03 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > > >> > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are. > >> > >> No, because that mixes in the array types which we know

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Dave Page
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >> > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are. >> >> No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes >> confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them wi

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 18:40:15, Simon Riggs a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 15:04 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > > [...] > > > * Want Copy/Paste objects between schemas. > > > > That's something already in my mind. I was also thinking about doing drag > > and drop between schemas. > >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 20:31:57, Simon Riggs a écrit : > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are. > > > > No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes > > confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are. > > No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes > confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them with the > non-array types, but thats likely to be messy. How

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Dave Page
On 4/26/09, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 15:01 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> Le vendredi 24 avril 2009 à 10:47:41, Dave Page a écrit : >> > [...] >> > > * Want to be able to use SERIAL and BIGSERIAL types for columns >> > >> > You can, though I see they're at the end of the li

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 15:04 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > [...] > > * Want Copy/Paste objects between schemas. > > > > That's something already in my mind. I was also thinking about doing drag and > drop between schemas. Drag and drop probably should be a Move rather than a Copy action.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Feedback from recent training

2009-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 15:01 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le vendredi 24 avril 2009 à 10:47:41, Dave Page a écrit : > > [...] > > > * Want to be able to use SERIAL and BIGSERIAL types for columns > > > > You can, though I see they're at the end of the list (probably because > > it lists types,