[pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin III] #241: Connection color is not correctly changed in query windows connection drop-down

#241: Connection color is not correctly changed in query windows connection drop- down -+-- Reporter: Valentine Gogichashvili | Owner: gleu Type: bug | Status: new Priority: minor

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin III] #240: Trigger Display Bugs in 1.12 pgAdmin

#240: Trigger Display Bugs in 1.12 pgAdmin --+- Reporter: Christopher A Hotchkiss | Owner: gleu Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: minor| Milestone: 1

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Fix the reverse-engineered query for triggers

Fix the reverse-engineered query for triggers The new "OF column" syntax is only available for UPDATE, and we should check the args only if the number of args is not zero. Set the bytea_output parameter to its old value on 9.0 right after a connection. The tgargs column is of type bytea and bytea

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Fix the reverse-engineered query for triggers

Fix the reverse-engineered query for triggers The new "OF column" syntax is only available for UPDATE, and we should check the args only if the number of args is not zero. Set the bytea_output parameter to its old value on 9.0 right after a connection. The tgargs column is of type bytea and bytea

[pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin III] #240: Trigger Display Bugs in 1.12 pgAdmin

#240: Trigger Display Bugs in 1.12 pgAdmin -+-- Reporter: Christopher A Hotchkiss | Owner: gleu Type: bug | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Compo

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Add .gitignore files.

Add .gitignore files. Branch -- REL-1_10_0_PATCHES Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=5ff2f1096d3018dcc4b8e3275d90bf660531e641 Modified Files -- .gitignore| 14 ++ pgadmin/.gitignore|5 ++

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Add .gitignore files.

Add .gitignore files. Branch -- REL-1_12_0_PATCHES Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=d7b1bd697b5faea355ce6a3f7476045cbc4cf807 Modified Files -- .gitignore| 14 ++ pgadmin/.gitignore|5 ++

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Add .gitignore files.

Add .gitignore files. Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1ed23412a79fabb55b81c01a31a012485725d4e Modified Files -- .gitignore| 14 ++ pgadmin/.gitignore|5 + pgadmin/

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Guillaume Lelarge píše v Pá 24. 09. 2010 v 16:20 +0200: > Le 24/09/2010 15:16, Marek Černocký a écrit : > > I comprehend your concern for quality. But now I have no clear info > > about documentation changes. I would have to study git changelogs or do > > other frustration work. It has impact on do

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Branch refs/heads/mybugfixwork was created

Le 24/09/2010 15:44, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 15:40, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Le 23/09/2010 22:47, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 22:20, Guillaume Lelarge >>> wrote: Le 23/09/2010 22:12, [email protected] a écrit : >>> [...] the re

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Le 24/09/2010 15:16, Marek Černocký a écrit : > I comprehend your concern for quality. But now I have no clear info > about documentation changes. I would have to study git changelogs or do > other frustration work. It has impact on documentation translation > completeness and quality too. > You

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Branch refs/heads/mybugfixwork was created

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 15:40, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le 23/09/2010 22:47, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 22:20, Guillaume Lelarge >> wrote: >>> Le 23/09/2010 22:12, [email protected] a écrit : >> [...] >>> the repo. I just pushed a branch there. I deleted it, so I don't

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Branch refs/heads/mybugfixwork was created

Le 23/09/2010 22:47, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 22:20, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Le 23/09/2010 22:12, [email protected] a écrit : > [...] >> the repo. I just pushed a branch there. I deleted it, so I don't think >> it's really that bad. Magnus, any idea on this? a "git

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

I comprehend your concern for quality. But now I have no clear info about documentation changes. I would have to study git changelogs or do other frustration work. It has impact on documentation translation completeness and quality too. I translate Gnome (which uses own tools for work with documen

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I know you're not suggesting it, but just so we're clear - the day >> pgAdmin starts to use docuwiki is the day that Microsoft release a >> Linux distro, Apple BSD licence all their code, pigs around the world >> spontaneously sprout wing

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:23, Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Not really because of ReST. Our real issue was the tool we used to build >> HTML, PDF, etc. This tool was first written by dalibo, but nobody really >> maintains it and it became more

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Le 24/09/2010 12:23, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Not really because of ReST. Our real issue was the tool we used to build >> HTML, PDF, etc. This tool was first written by dalibo, but nobody really >> maintains it and it became more and mor

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Not really because of ReST. Our real issue was the tool we used to build > HTML, PDF, etc. This tool was first written by dalibo, but nobody really > maintains it and it became more and more difficult to install it on > recent laptops. S

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Le 24/09/2010 12:06, Marek Černocký a écrit : > It would be nice to choice format the gettext (or similar tool) know > about. It's very difficult to track changes in the current documentation > for translators. > Gettext really doesn't work for documentation. It's much harder to know the context

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Le 24/09/2010 11:59, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Le 24/09/2010 10:39, Dave Page a écrit : >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >>> wrote: Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an e

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:16, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le 24/09/2010 10:39, Dave Page a écrit : >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> wrote: >>> Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an >>> example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. >>

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Le 24/09/2010 10:39, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an >> example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. >> >> The real question is how we do this. Right now, the documen

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

Le 24/09/2010 10:36, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:34, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> Le 24/09/2010 10:23, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge >>> wrote: I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my co

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an > example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. > > The real question is how we do this. Right now, the documentation is a > set of HTML files. Which is fine fo

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:29, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an > example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. > > The real question is how we do this. Right now, the documentation is a > set of HTML files. Which is fine for

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:34, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le 24/09/2010 10:23, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge >> wrote: >>> I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my >>> colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore file

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

Le 24/09/2010 10:31, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : > Le 24/09/2010 10:21, Dave Page a écrit : >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> wrote: >>> I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my >>> colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

Le 24/09/2010 10:23, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my >> colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now, >> when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, conf

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

+1 -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise Postgres Company On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

Le 24/09/2010 10:21, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: >> I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my >> colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now, >> when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, configure

[pgadmin-hackers] Documentation

Documentation for pgAdmin is really weak right now. Just to take an example, I don't know where a plugin file is described. The real question is how we do this. Right now, the documentation is a set of HTML files. Which is fine for some people and not for others. Kind of hard to get a consistent s

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my > colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now, > when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, configure it and make it, "git > status" shows a lot of uni

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my > colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now, > when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, configure it and make it, "git > status" shows a lot of u

[pgadmin-hackers] gitignore

I was reading pgsql-hackers this morning while waiting for my colleagues. There's an interesting thread on gitignore files. Right now, when you grab a git branch, bootstrap it, configure it and make it, "git status" shows a lot of uninteresting files. A .gitignore file would help to notice changed