Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch to support SSL certificate connections

2011-01-20 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 19/01/2011 00:35, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : > Hi, > > This patch adds support to specify SSL certificate files and to connect > according to those. > > It's pretty straightforward: four file pickers to handle on dlgServer, > and changes in the connection code to add those parameters in the >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Dave Page
A wizard as you suggest has been on my "if only i had the time and energy" todo list for a few years :-) On 1/20/11, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Why don't we have a wizard-type facility to generate a Slonik script, > rather than calling the "bare-metal" functions ourselves? That could > potentially

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 20/01/2011 20:15, Peter Geoghegan a écrit : > Why don't we have a wizard-type facility to generate a Slonik script, > rather than calling the "bare-metal" functions ourselves? That could > potentially be much more useful. The reason that the existing > facilities are a bit of a chore to use when

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Peter Geoghegan
Why don't we have a wizard-type facility to generate a Slonik script, rather than calling the "bare-metal" functions ourselves? That could potentially be much more useful. The reason that the existing facilities are a bit of a chore to use when you get past a couple of nodes is that paths and liste

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 20/01/2011 19:39, Devrim GÜNDÜZ a écrit : > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:37 +, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> >>> ...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that >>> helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as >>> possible. >> >> I'm just not sure that Pg

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Peter Geoghegan
2011/1/20 Devrim GÜNDÜZ : > I pretty much agree with you -- but not all people can use cli, or can > maintain Slony-I using altperl tools. I use the command line for lots of things, but I also find GUI tools like PgAdmin useful. For example, I have a strong preference for developing Postgres funct

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:37 +, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > > ...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that > > helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as > > possible. > > I'm just not sure that PgAdmin actually makes setting up a Slony-I > clus

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Peter Geoghegan
2011/1/20 Devrim GÜNDÜZ : > ...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that > helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as > possible. I'm just not sure that PgAdmin actually makes setting up a Slony-I cluster easier than writing a Slonik script. It pr

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for Slony 2.0?

2011-01-20 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:19 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > But before working on this, I want to make sure this won't be a > useless effort. So I guess I would like to have a final decision on > this. Do we decide to drop Slony support in 1.14, or do we decide that > I can work on it, fix it,