in PG server and EPAS Meta.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>> Patch applied.
>>
>> Fahar, can you please
do as you suggest and migrate existing values for
>>> SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT, given that there's clearly some other per user and
>>> per installation/database salting going on anyway. New installations can
>>> have the random value for SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT.
>>>
>> We do not need to generate the random SECURITY_PASSWORD_SALT during
>> upgrade mode, which was wrong added in my addon patch.
>>
>> Please find the updated patch.
>>
>> Otherwise - looks good to me.
>> Please commit the new patch (if you're ok with the change).
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Ashesh Vashi
>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>
>>
>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>
>>>
>>> I don't believe SECURITY_KEY and CSRF_SESSION_KEY are issues either, as
>>> they're used for purposes that are essentially ephemeral, and thus can be
>>> changed during an upgrade.
>>>
>>> Adding Magnus as I'd appreciate any thoughts he may have.
>>>
>>> Patch attached - please review (Ashesh, but others too would be
>>> appreciated)!
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Sandeep Thakkar
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > I have attached the patch (pgadminpro.patch) to fix this.
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created virtual environment and tried building pgadmin on my Mac with
&
refer the actual directory)
and instead create a sym link. There might be other way to fix this, but I
found this to be easy. :)
Thanks!
--
Sandeep Thakkar
pgadmin-macbuild.patch
Description: Binary data
pgadminpro.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list
el the requirement of it.
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ashesh Vashi
> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>
>
> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi&
we
> don't support back-branches long term anyway.
>
> Does anyone think we need to support side-by-side RPM/DEB installation of
> multiple major versions of pgAdmin? Devrim? Hamid?
>
> The config file would be part of the web package.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at
tpd/conf.d/pgadmin4-v1.conf. The online docs for pgAdmin have a
> section on configuring that.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Sandeep Thakkar <
> sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I got the point. To distinguish between v1 and v2, we can hav
th your suggested code - I just want to make
> sure we need it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
> sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you mean to say when a python app is launched, it imports some modules
>> automatically and
e
> system - doesn't it know where it's site-packages are already? I could see
> us needing this is we were using a distro-independent build of Python and
> wanted to find the OS site-packages location, but we're not.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandeep Thakkar <
> s
Hi Dave,
how about changes in the pgadmin4 source code for conf.py and Server.cpp?
Looks okay?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dave.
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Thanks Dave.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Hi Devrim, Hi Dave,
> >
> > I have updated the patch. The earl
-web-1.0_dev-1.rhel7.noarch*
--
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Few changes in the updated patch:
> - added the missing modules in the specfile. The unavailable modules are
> still commented.
> - add
okay. Thanks again!
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Dave!
> >
> > I saw the runtime code and ob
t; the location of the venv in the appbundle).
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> >>
> &
Hi
Few changes in the updated patch:
- added the missing modules in the specfile. The unavailable modules are
still commented.
- added changelog in specfile
- added dependency of pgadmin4-doc on pgadmin4-web
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.
ndle?
2. Should web rpm require doc rpm? I guess so, otherwise online help won't
work. Right?
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> [Adding Devrim]
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrot
/'//g"` ?
>
> yes, I have used the couple of more variables that gives proper
understanding.
Thanks! I have attached the updated patch. (runtime changes remains same).
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com&g
Somehow the patch skipped the Makefile changes. Attached is the updated
patch.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I have fixed all the issues.
>
> Regarding the app not running from within the DMG for th
Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> > <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure. Thanks.
> >>
> >> There is a typo in pkg/mac/build.sh. i.e
> >>
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Initial eyeball review comments below...
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Sandeep Thakkar <
> sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team, Dave,
>>
>>
gt; > and also the tree for $QTDIR/lib
>
> Attached.
>
> Also, my config database now seems to be trashed since I ran "make
> appbundle" :-(
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: htt
gets
> (No such file or directory)
> complete-bundle.sh failed
> make: *** [appbundle] Error 1
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > I have added the 'docs' target in the /Makefile. This targ
;dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Sandeep Thakkar <
> sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave
>>
>> I have fixed the issues. Attached is the updated patch.
>>
>> The docs are built as part of 'appbundle' targe
:20 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Okay, so the patch needs a little change because of the change in the
> versioning for pgAdmin. Will update it.
>
> Paresh, please take a note of it.
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Sandeep
Okay, so the patch needs a little change because of the change in the
versioning for pgAdmin. Will update it.
Paresh, please take a note of it.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
> I have fixed the i
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Sandeep Thakkar <
> sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave
>>
>> I have fixed the issues. Attached is the updated patch.
>>
i, May 13, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Sandeep Thakkar
> <sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Dave.
> >
> > Please see inline.
> >
> > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Dave
idgets.framework/Versions/5/QtWebKitWidgets
> to QtWebKitWidgets
> error:
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/install_name_tool:
> can't open file:
> Contents/Frameworks/QtWebKitWidgets.framework/Versions/5/QtWebKitWidgets
> (No such file or directory
not for the already absolute path (ex.
ApplicationPath like /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pgadmin4-web).
Well, I'm not a developer and the patch is just an attempt to resolve the
issue related to packaging. Please feel free to change it as required for
better.
Thanks.
--
Sandeep Thakkar
Le
---
pgadmin4-fixpath-mac.patch - This is for runtime/Server.cpp to fix the path
where the runtime looks for web application path in app bundle.
Kindly review and suggest the changes required. Thanks.
--
Sandeep Thakkar
pgadmin4-fixpath-mac.patch
Description: Binary data
pgadmin4-mac
Sorry, the patch contained the unnecessary newline in the condition. This
is fixed and the patch is attached.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Thanks - patch applied.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Sandeep Thakkar
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com wrote
Hi
We dynamically build wxWidgets and hence the hhp2cached.exe is present
in %WXWIN%\utils\hhp2cached\*vc_mswudll* instead
of %WXWIN%\utils\hhp2cached\*vc_mswu*
Attached is the patch for builddocs.bat that will work with both static and
dynamic builds.
--
Sandeep Thakkar
Lead Software
i386
So, the grep fails there. Attached herewith is the patch that should work
for Mach-O i386 executable and as well as Mach-O executable i386
outputs.
--
Sandeep Thakkar
pgadmin.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
the PostgreSQL 9.2
installers tomorrow (don't update the older branches though).
Thanks.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sandeep Thakkar
Senior Software Engineer
LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sandeep Thakkar
sandeep.thak...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Sure. I'll update the pgAdmin for PostgreSQL 9.2.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
I've uploaded the pgAdmin
36 matches
Mail list logo
