Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can you take a quick look at this new patch? Thanks. I'll commit it if
>> you find it good enough.
>
> Thanks - that looked good, so I've committed it (as I only too a
> couple of clicks :-
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you take a quick look at this new patch? Thanks. I'll commit it if
> you find it good enough.
Thanks - that looked good, so I've committed it (as I only too a
couple of clicks :-p ). I did increase the default
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Still a hack but it works. It even works with GTK. The patch attached
>> removes the WXMAC ifdef.
>>
I also found on Windows that the check boxes for different privileges
on the privil
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Still a hack but it works. It even works with GTK. The patch attached
> removes the WXMAC ifdef.
>
>>> I also found on Windows that the check boxes for different privileges
>>> on the privilege panes are touching each
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> [...]
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. I still don't like this hack. I hope I'll soon better understand
>>
Dave Page a écrit :
> [...]
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Thanks. I still don't like this hack. I hope I'll soon better understand
>>> this issue to replace the ugly co
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, actually, I want to finish this book : "The Art of SQL", Stéphane
> Faroult with Peter Robson, O'Reilly. Quite interesting, even if I
> already know most of it. Do you know some books about database
> internals?
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> [...]
>> Till PostgreSQL 8.4 beta, I'll only work on pgAdmin. First on your bug
>> report, then on the server status window and last on i18n.
>
> Sounds ambitious :-).
>
Yeah, but I didn't say I will do all of this :) At l
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> Did you see the message below? Don't worry if you did - I just want to
>> ensure it didn't get lost!
>>
>
> Sorry for not answering sooner. I've seen it, I've printed it so that
Dave Page a écrit :
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Did you see the message below? Don't worry if you did - I just want to
> ensure it didn't get lost!
>
Sorry for not answering sooner. I've seen it, I've printed it so that I
cannot forget it, I just didn't find time (and courage) to work on it.
Till Postg
Hi Guillaume,
Did you see the message below? Don't worry if you did - I just want to
ensure it didn't get lost!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks. I still don't like th
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. I still don't like this hack. I hope I'll soon better understand
> this issue to replace the ugly code with a good one.
You're going to hate this - but I just tested Gevik's work on Windows,
and seem to be see
Dave Page a écrit :
> [...]
> Nice work!! So, let's please get this applied so we can put it to bed.
> A couple of minor fixes:
>
> - In dlgFunction::Go @367, you have:
>
> returncode = dlgSecurityProperty::Go(modal);
>
> returncode = dlgSecurityProperty::Go(modal);
>
> Copy/paste error
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a new (complete) patch. I don't like at all what I did but it
> seems to fix your issues.
OK, here we go
dlgTable:
Existing table: OK
New table: OK
dlgSequence:
Existing sequence: OK
New sequence: OK
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry for giving you so many testing work... :-/
>
> No problem.
>
>> Here is a new (complete) patch. I don't like at all what I did but it
>> seems to fix your issues.
>
> Well I haven't bee
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for giving you so many testing work... :-/
No problem.
> Here is a new (complete) patch. I don't like at all what I did but it
> seems to fix your issues.
Well I haven't been able to test it yet (I'm currentl
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OK, problem was in the CreateColumns function, file
>> pgadmin/ctl/ctlListView.cpp. Complete patch attached.
>
> Okey-doke. So the latest testing shows:
>
> dlgTable:
> [...]
> dlgView:
>
>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, problem was in the CreateColumns function, file
> pgadmin/ctl/ctlListView.cpp. Complete patch attached.
Okey-doke. So the latest testing shows:
dlgTable:
Existing table: Privileges listview may missing until resi
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It seems I finally get something working. But not yet for dlgFunction.
>>> Can you take a look at it? I just want to know if I haven't break other
>>> things. If
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It seems I finally get something working. But not yet for dlgFunction.
>> Can you take a look at it? I just want to know if I haven't break other
>> things. If it works, I will commit this patch
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems I finally get something working. But not yet for dlgFunction.
> Can you take a look at it? I just want to know if I haven't break other
> things. If it works, I will commit this patch and work on the
> dlgFuncti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from frpar-46plp-vipfw.publicis.fr [81.200.176.13] with HTTP/1.1
(POST); Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:29:01 +0200
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems I finally get something working. But not yet for dlgFunction.
> Can you take a look at it? I just want to know if I haven't break other
> things. If it works, I will commit this patch and work on the
> dlgFuncti
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>> I found a couple of small bugs in the new layout code for dlgFunction:
>>>
>>> - The Privileges (and SQL) panes don't size themselves properly when
>>> viewing
Dave Page a écrit :
> [...]
> I found a couple of small bugs in the new layout code for dlgFunction:
>
> - The Privileges (and SQL) panes don't size themselves properly when
> viewing an existing function, until the dialogue is manually resized
> - The privilege checkboxes are touching the role co
26 matches
Mail list logo
