Hi guys,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 April 2003 01:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools
>
> >Here are my two cents. We put a "view" menu in BOTH our
> tools.
> That's not far from my soluti
Hi Frank,
It's rumoured that frank_lupo once said:
> Hi Dave
>
> There are many new functionalities for pgadmin2 that I would want to
> develop.
I wonder if it has sense to make them or of it it is worth
> the pain.
How much time will want that the pgadmin3 before to us
> usable?
> I see that th
Le Mercredi 2 Avril 2003 14:54, Dave Page a écrit :
> What do you (and Mark, Jean-Michel, Keith, Andreas - and anyone else I
> forgot) think?
Dear friends,
I don't have many things to say as I am not a contributor to pgAdmin3.
pgAdmin3 seems to be the future... You are doing a great job, I whish
Andreas,
> >That's old code. It's been namespaced for more than a month.
> >
I just committed the changes that deal with that. Go ahead and update. Also
there is a bit more functionality on the QueryBuilder. I'll be spending most
of the day finishing up what I started. It should be mostly done b
Dave Page wrote:
Yup, certainly is. BTW, did you know that thanks to Frank Lupo, pga2 fully
supports Casts and Conversions in the schema now?
OK, message understood.
CAST, CONVERSION and OPERATOR CLASS are missing in pgadmin3 (yet). Any
more objects of your desire?
Centerfolds excepted.
Regar
frank_lupo wrote:
Hi Dave
There are many new functionalities for pgadmin2 that I would want to develop.
I wonder if it has sense to make them or of it it is worth the pain.
How much time will want that the pgadmin3 before to us usable?
I see that the development and much assets.
What I must mak
Dave et al,
* This is a temporary solution until the cache is built.
I need to get a list of operators from the database that will return only
booleans types, not integer types. This is basically a list of possible
"join" operators.
This is the query I've found works the best. Do namespaces matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 April 2003 22:47
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3: present and future
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >This would *definately* be easier to implement in PostgreSQL
>
Hi Dave
Ok finally they are successful to use cvs.
I have download the pgadmin2, pgschema and activex.
When I execute the compilation using BuildAll.bat, proposals of the errors come me.
Impossible to set up the compatible component with the version:
c:\pgadmin2\binaries\pgschema.dll.
This er
Dave Page wrote:
That's alright. Tom Lane explained why it wouldn't work in the backend
anyway...
Regards, Dave.
Dave,
maybe you got me wrong.
The CODING is already done... :-)
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsub
Dave Page wrote:
That's fine with me. My major concern is that the code that drives the
grid is only written once. This is likely to get quite complex once
editting features are added, and I don't want to maintain 2 copies. I
always want to keep the look and feel consistant.
So, how about we creat
It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>That's alright. Tom Lane explained why it wouldn't work in the backend
>>anyway...
>>
>>Regards, Dave.
>>
>>
>>
> Dave,
>
> maybe you got me wrong.
> The CODING is already done... :-)
No, I understood. I meant that it's OK you work
It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Actually, I see YAQT (yet another query tool) for editing a table. You
> just pick a table (maybe view), hit "Edit" and scroll up and down in
> there. It must be capable of unlimited rows, which isn't easy but can
> be done (I already implemented somet
Dave Page wrote:
So you're saying we make the arbitrary query tools (SQL/QB) produce very
fast, but read-only output, but add an 'Edit' option for tables/views,
that allows editting of their contents an a purpose designed grid?
That would certainly be easier to code as we would always know the bas
Hi Dave
There are many new functionalities for pgadmin2 that I would want to develop.
I wonder if it has sense to make them or of it it is worth the pain.
How much time will want that the pgadmin3 before to us usable?
I see that the development and much assets.
What I must make?
Bye !!
Frank
It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Exactly. I've seen quite a lot of querying tools, and most of them were
> quite ugly and at the edge of usability. For my experience, I think
> two tool windows are the easiest way to handle it, not only in
> concerning coding, but also regarding use
> -Original Message-
> From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 April 2003 08:04
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] problem compilation pgadmin2
>
>
> Hi Dave
>
>
>
> Ok finally they are successful to use cvs.
>
> I have download the pgadmin2, pgschema
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 April 2003 08:04
> > To: pgadmin-hackers
> > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] problem compilation pgadmin2
> >
> >
> > Hi Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok finally they are successful to use cvs.
> >
> > I have
18 matches
Mail list logo
