[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 on Windows 9x

2003-10-14 Thread Howard Bagcat
Quoting Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? > > Windows 9x doesn't have the Unicode support we require, and we figured > that most ppl are on Win2k by now. You are the first person to have > brought it up! I believed me too. I raised that iss

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mardi 14 Octobre 2003 17:02, Dave Page a écrit : > > Kool. Could you create > > http://snake.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/SRPMS please to avoid > > duplicates. Thanks, Jean-Michel > Done. I don't have enough rights to upload the SRPM package there. Cheers, Jean-Michel ---(e

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 19:37 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Hiroshi Saito; Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > > as this "my" first maintenance release with you and just fo

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Andreas Pflug
Raphaël Enrici wrote: Dave Page wrote: OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Lemme know if anything isn't right. Hopefully we won't need any more as this was a right pita to produce with the wx changes Regards, Dave Hi all, as this "my" first maintenance release with

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Dave Page wrote: OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Lemme know if anything isn't right. Hopefully we won't need any more as this was a right pita to produce with the wx changes Regards, Dave Hi all, as this "my" first maintenance release with you and just for my p

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Andreas Pflug
Serguei Mokhov wrote: Huh? Windows 3.1 is a "ancient 16-bit software"; Windows 95/98/Me are all 32-bit. They are 32 bit GUIs on a 16 bit OS, formerly called DOS... I'm having no problems with other software tools with Unicode support. :P Hu? AFAIR thes windows version lack Unicode support. It

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Serguei Mokhov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 16:56 > To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Saito; Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > > I will look into doing a port then. > > Thanks :) OK, I g

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 11:57 AM > Serguei Mokhov wrote: > > >Huh? Windows 3.1 is a "ancient 16-bit software"; Windows 95/98/Me > >are all 32-bit. > > > They are 32 bit GUIs on a 16 bit OS, formerly called DOS... Yes, I know.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Serguei Mokhov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 16:38 > To: Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > > Huh? Windows 3.1 is a "ancient 16-bit software"; Windows > 95/98/Me are all 32-bit.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 11:44 AM > > Oh, really? :| Cuz quite a few users still use Windows 98. > > Yes, really. Search the archives... > > > (Yet very small fraction of them use PG and the admin tools; > > out of which phpPgAdm

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Serguei Mokhov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 16:36 > To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Saito; Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > > > Oh, really? :| Cuz quite a few users still use Windows 9

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 11:24 AM > >>OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. > >> > >>Lemme know if anything isn't right. > >> > >> > > > >What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? > >Sorry

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 11:07 AM > > > OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. > > > > > > Lemme know if anything isn't right. > > > > What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? > > Windows 9x d

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Andreas Pflug
Serguei Mokhov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 10:30 AM OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Lemme know if anything isn't right. What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? Sorry for jum

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Serguei Mokhov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 16:09 > To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Saito; Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: October 14, 2003 10:30 AM > OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. > > Lemme know if anything isn't right. What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? Sorry for jumping in, especially if t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 15:43 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > Le Mardi 14 Octobre 2003 16:30, Dave Page a écrit : > > OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source a

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mardi 14 Octobre 2003 16:30, Dave Page a écrit : > OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Kool. Could you create http://snake.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/SRPMS please to avoid duplicates. Thanks, Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Page > Sent: 13 October 2003 20:33 > To: Hiroshi Saito; Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 13 Octo

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 snapshots compiled for RedHat, Mandrake and SuSE

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 14:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 snapshots compiled for > RedHat, Mandrake and SuSE > > Le Lundi 13 Octobre 2003 18:00, Andreas Pflug a écrit : > > Well,

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 snapshots compiled for RedHat, Mandrake and SuSE

2003-10-14 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Lundi 13 Octobre 2003 18:00, Andreas Pflug a écrit : > Well, that makes 3:1 votes now :-) Dear buddies, I got pgAdmin3 snapshots to compile and publised them. An old version of wxWindows was installed under /usr/local/... After manual removal, pgAdmin3 compiled like a charm. Cheers, Jean-Mi

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wx snapshot compile failure

2003-10-14 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 01:37 > To: Andreas Pflug > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wx snapshot compile failure > > On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 18:45 US/Eastern, Andreas Pflug wrote: > > > I