Your ip address range is probably different when connecting via a VPN rather than in
the office. By default postgres will not allow connections from other locations even
if tcpip_socket is true without specifying an ip address range, database etc.
Checkout the docs. There is a section on pg_hb
twinsen wrote:
Hi all
I have an architecture 'problem' which I would like to
bounce off you. We have five remote Interactive Voice
Response sites interconnected via WAN links. I have
two Postgresql databases replicated at one of the
sites. I need to capture data (mostly stats) from the
IVR's and st
Hi all
I have an architecture 'problem' which I would like to
bounce off you. We have five remote Interactive Voice
Response sites interconnected via WAN links. I have
two Postgresql databases replicated at one of the
sites. I need to capture data (mostly stats) from the
IVR's and store the data i
Yes I can ping the server if not connected via VPN.
I'm using EMS PostgreSQL Manager, which works if not via VPN.
Yes, postgresql.conf's tcpip_socket = true.
The log says: FATAL: No pg_hba.conf entry for host 10.29.15.113, user
postgres, database TEST.
Thanks for your help!
Regards,
- Lily A
We'd be very interested in the performance, especially with the disk
being used as in interconnect (I assume that that is being used to
simulate global shared memory?)
We did have a talk with the folks over at http://www.linuxlabs.com/clustgres
They were honest enough to say that even with the D
2 dual PIII-1.4GHz Linux RedHat 3.0 servers each with onboard AIC7xxx
and 2 U160 drives (mirrored), 2 GB of ECC memory, 2 onboard Intel Ether
Pro 100Mbps type NIC's, 1 Qlogic 2310 HBA on a 1GBs SAN using a Candera
510 storage cluster with Xyratex SATA on the backend configured with 1+0
LUN's. It w
Hi all,
I had my Solaris 8 machine upgraded with latest
patches. No change. Still does not like
255.255.255.255. Using the alternate format of
IP-address/32 does fix the problem, though so glad to
have a workaround. Still it would be nice to know why
this happens on some systems and not on oth
Do you mean that you are actually testing this product now? If so,
what's the hardware configuration (nodes, storage server, interconnects)
that you are using?
Warmest regards,
Ericson Smith
Tracking Specialist/DBA
+---+-+
| http://www
Robert,
I am currently evaluating PolyServe Matrix Server which is a clustering
solution including a clustered file system (mounted read-write
everywhere).
Anything special anyone wants to know? I'm using PostgreSQL 7.4.2 in
a Linux cluster.
Greg
Robert Treat wrote:
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:30, Kr
