Allan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's kinda hard to believe; how would a shared memory segment survive
>> a system crash?
> I don't think they can. Some options:
> (1) PostgreSQL keeps a reference to it somewhere and can get confused...
Indeed, there is a ref
Tom Lane wrote:
> Allan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>If my (RH 7.1) system crashes PostgreSQL does not restart automatically
>>because the shared memory segment identifier and the .pid file remains,
>>
>
> That's kinda hard to believe; how would a shared memory segment survive
>
Allan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If my (RH 7.1) system crashes PostgreSQL does not restart automatically
> because the shared memory segment identifier and the .pid file remains,
That's kinda hard to believe; how would a shared memory segment survive
a system crash?
> % pg_ctl
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I couldn't find it.
If my (RH 7.1) system crashes PostgreSQL does not restart automatically
because the shared memory segment identifier and the .pid file remains,
as a manual start explains:
% pg_ctl start
pg_ctl: Another postmaster may be running. Trying to s
