On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 02:10, Peter Galbavy wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neither of those readings is correct. The correct interpretation is
that the copyright holders (us and UCB, in the case of Postgres)
aren't charging any fee. This does not prohibit others from charging
for their own
Eric Yum wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/licence.html
You should get your local legal professional to give an opinion if you
intend to redistribute. One specific area of contention amongst BSD
license people is the phrase:
... for any purpose, without fee, and ...
Some opine that this means
Peter Galbavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should get your local legal professional to give an opinion if you
intend to redistribute. One specific area of contention amongst BSD
license people is the phrase:
... for any purpose, without fee, and ...
Some opine that this means the software in
Tom Lane wrote:
Neither of those readings is correct. The correct interpretation is
that the copyright holders (us and UCB, in the case of Postgres)
aren't charging any fee. This does not prohibit others from charging
for their own efforts.
As I said in my original reply, intention has
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:04:10PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
The FSF web site then compares various variations on BSD licenses,
considering that there are some that they deem to be free (in their
terms), and that there are others that they deem to _NOT_ be free
(again in their terms).
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Quale wrote:
| Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|
|The FSF characterizes the PostgreSQL license as being an X11 style
|license. They felt a need to distinguish between different
|variations of licenses that are called 'BSD licenses.'
|
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Radu-Adrian Popescu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Quale wrote:
| Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|
|The FSF characterizes the PostgreSQL license as being an X11 style
|license. They felt a need to distinguish between different
Radu-Adrian Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doug Quale wrote:
| The Postgres license is a free software license that is GPL
| compatible.
Where GPL compatible means (possibly among other things) that I can get
a BSD-licensed Postgresql and turn it into a GPL-licensed MyPostgresql ?
Hi,
| The Postgres license is a free software license that is GPL
| compatible.
Where GPL compatible means (possibly among other things) that I can get
a BSD-licensed Postgresql and turn it into a GPL-licensed MyPostgresql ?
No, it means you can distribute the two together like on
Dear Sir
I am a developer of one commercial organization. We are
going to develop some applications with PostgreSQL
7.3.3. I learn from some websites that it cost no charge for developing
software with PostgreSQL in commercial environment.
However, I saw the PostgreSQL is under two type
-Original Message-From: Eric Yum
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004
1:30 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ADMIN]
License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose
Dear
Sir
I am a
developer of one commercial organization. We are going to develop
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Eric Yum wrote:
Dear Sir
I am a developer of one commercial organization. We are going to develop
some applications with PostgreSQL 7.3.3. I learn from some websites that
it cost no charge for developing software with PostgreSQL in commercial
environment. However, I
Eric Yum wrote:
Dear Sir
I am a developer of one commercial organization. We are going to
develop some applications with PostgreSQL 7.3.3. I learn from some
websites that it cost no charge for developing software with
PostgreSQL in commercial environment. However, I saw the PostgreSQL
is under
13 matches
Mail list logo
