On 11/10/20 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 11/9/20 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What I have in mind to apply to 9.5 through 13 is per attached.
>> You also need to modify first_el_agg_any.
> ... doh. That one is a little messier because there's no equally useful
> subst
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 11/9/20 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I have in mind to apply to 9.5 through 13 is per attached.
> You also need to modify first_el_agg_any.
... doh. That one is a little messier because there's no equally useful
substitute function. What I'm inclined to do for t
On 11/9/20 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What I have in mind to apply to 9.5 through 13 is per attached.
> You could either redefine the aggregate similarly in 9.2-9.4,
> or just drop it. I doubt the latter leads to any interesting
> loss of coverage for xversion upgrade, as there's plenty of oth
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 11/9/20 5:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. To fix it this way, we'd have to push the test-script change
>> into the pre-9.5 branches. There's no technical reason we can't do
>> that, I don't think, though it's a bit outside our normal practices.
> I doubt it's necessary
On 11/9/20 5:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 11/9/20 4:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think probably the right fix is just to change that test case to
>>> use a different implementation function, per [1]. I'm holding off
>>> pushing the fix till after this week's wraps, thou
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 11/9/20 4:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think probably the right fix is just to change that test case to
>> use a different implementation function, per [1]. I'm holding off
>> pushing the fix till after this week's wraps, though.
> I'd be ok with that. Can we devise a
On 11/9/20 4:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 11/4/20 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
>> This patch broke cross-version pg_upgrade testing.
> Uh, yeah ... didn't you get my two prior messages about that?
Ye
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 11/4/20 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
> This patch broke cross-version pg_upgrade testing.
Uh, yeah ... didn't you get my two prior messages about that?
> I have cured crake
> for the moment by having
On 11/4/20 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
>
> Convert array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position,
> array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket
> to use anycompatiblearray. This is a simple extension
Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
Convert array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position,
array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket
to use anycompatiblearray. This is a simple extension of commit
5c292e6b9 to hit some other places wh
10 matches
Mail list logo
